Vygotsky Scrutinize Language

In Vygotsky’s sociocultural development theory, social interaction plays an important role in the process of cognitive development, which is different then Piaget’s understanding of child development. Vygotsky believed children are active knowledge

Since language is our means of communicating cultural knowledge, it is extremely important in this theory. Vygotsky was particularly interested in the relationship between language and thinking processes; he believed language was crucial for cognitive development.

When meaning is attached to words or sequences of speech sounds, young children begin to develop semantic knowledge. Children develop semantic knowledge through their experiences in varied environmental contexts that foster concept development. Semantic development is impacted by direct experiences because these experiences occur from birth on,

As a problem presents itself, children will verbally work through the steps to solve it. This ‘private speech’ is a vital part to cognitive development, according to Vygotsky. This private speech gradually progresses into thinking as children become more proficient. He was also a proponent for scaffolding which is a process in which a new task is given and direct instruction is given then gradually taken away as the child learns. Both psychologists believed that children learn and develop through action but in different ways; Piaget felt it was through personal, self action while Vygotsky felt is was through social interaction, internalization and vocalization. Vygotsky and Piaget realized that social factors play a part in cognitive development but in different ways; According Piaget, self processing within a child leads to social processing while Vygotsky felt the opposite- social processing leads to self processing. Lastly, both came to the conclusion that by internalizing information, children transform it into knowledge and mental growth.

The child’s response affects the way they will continue to communicate. When the child starts putting meaning to the words that is being said Semantics comes into play. This directs them to believe nurture is the dominant role in children’s language development.

His views of how children and young people’s minds work and develop have been enormously influential particularly in educational theory. His particular insight was the role of maturation and increasing the capacity to understand their world, they can’t undertake certain tasks until they are psychologically mature enough to do so. The research has spawned a great deal more, much of which has undermined the detail of his own, but like many other original investigations his importance comes from his overall vision. Today Piaget’s theories have helped to change how people viewed the child or young person’s world and the way they study them he has inspired many theorist to improve on his studies. Piaget’s ideas have been of practical use in understanding and communicating, particularly in education. What he didn’t consider was the effect in the

Both Vygotsky and Piaget thought that language had some effect on childhood development. Both Piaget and Vygotsky highly contributed to the field of education and how their theories apply to the teaching and learning environment. In Berk (2014), Piaget gave a basic framework for teachers to follow by elaborating on “discovery learning, sensitivity to children’s readiness to learn, and acceptance of individual differences” (p. 233). Following Piaget’s guidelines, teachers allow children to learn by exploring their environment and in turn, finding new problems and tasks to solve. They also incorporate activities that are applicable to all children and

13. Both Piaget and Vygotsky dealt with the topic of egocentric speech, but they had very different interpretations of it. Piaget called it selfish speech; Vygotsky called it private speech. What did each theorist mean, and what would each predict about the development of this kind of speech and about the young child’s ability to use speech and language pragmatically? Whose interpretation does the bulk of the evidence support? Give some examples.

The idea of inner speech dates backs to the time of Plato and has been in use till date, but emphasis will be laid on Vygotsky’s work. The phrase inner speech was initially used by Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, to describe a stage in language acquisition and thought in his famous work ‘Language and Thought. Vygotsky is said to believe that "speech began as a social medium and became internalized as inner speech, that is, verbalised thought" (Katherin, 2006, p. 17). Since the translation and introduction of Vygotsky’s Language and Thought to the English-speaking world in 1962, it is presumably one of the most important and influential books that draw on cognitive science, and as well has become recognized as an exceptional groundwork of the evolution and theory of inner speech. Although, Vygotsky’s work has raised arguments as to whom the credit of the genesis of inner speech is due, being that his piece of work synthesized the ideas of other philosophers/ psychologists. In his phenomenal piece of work on human mental development, Vygotsky, analyzed the relationship between words and thoughts, and argues that only as children develop does speech in its social origins become

(675)An Analysis of the Importance of Language and Thought in Chapter 8 In a cognitive focus, “Chapter 8: Language and Thought” provided the most interesting evaluation of the process of thinking, which involves how human beings communicate with ach other. For example, one of the mot interesting aspects of the theory of this chapter revolves around the premise of “babbling” as a way to learn language. Typically, the idea of “babbling” often refers to verbal non-sense that does not have a cognitive purpose. However, I was astonished to learn that linguistic studies had defined how “babbling” can be an extremely useful way to practice the pronunciation of verbal sounds at an early stage of childhood development: “Babbling gradually becomes

Jean Piaget’s work focuses on cognitive development and what contributes to it. He examined the relationship between individual factors and social factors in moral affect, personality and intellectual development. “Piaget believed that children form social schemas just like they form schemas to understand the world” (DeVries, 1997). According to Piaget’s developmental theory, children play an active role in their own development through action and problem solving. Learning is both formal and informal.

Piaget *Missing Works Cited* Piaget work has received world wide acclaim and recognition , as well as having a positive impact in areas such as education and social curricula. Though he had made an impact on understanding of the child cognitive development , his theory of cognitive development has suffered a great deal of critics that it neglects the social nature of human development.(Hook, Watts and Cockroft ,2002).So the following essay will discuss on whether this critic is valid or not based on detail discussion of Piaget theory. The theory of Vygotsky shall also be discussed to prove that indeed social factors play a role .

According to Vygotsky believed that the development of an individual depend on the social factors, that means people develop according the social environment they are exposed and the things they interact with during their early stages in life (Kozulin, 2003). The argument here is that the learning and cognitive development is dependent on the social interactions that children go through and during their early stages, that is proximal zone and the environment have major role in children development. Piaget on the other hand, argues the cognitive development in independent of any external environment and aligns to the children development, therefore claims that children

Linguistics has impacted cognitive psychology as the quest to understand language acquisition and the structure of language itself is undertaken. Linguistics is a complex and multifaceted; it includes language structural patterns and language development (Barsalou, 2005). The process of language development is complicated and dense, as the study of language is examined; the role of cognition is inherently examined and analyzed. Sternberg (2006) also explores language as an innate process and presents the idea that humans are born ready for language as a biological and cognitive process.

This is the final stage of speech development. It is inner, sound less speech. This is the type of speech used by older children and adults. This type of speech allows us to direct our thinking and behavior. Once one has reached this final stage they are able to engage in all forms of higher mental functions. In this stage one is able to "count in one's head, use logical memory- inherent relationships, and inner signs." (Hanfmann, 1962) (pg)