Race And The War On Drugs Essay

For many years, drugs have been the center of crime and the criminal justice system in the United States. Due to this widespread epidemic, President Richard Nixon declared the “War on Drugs” in 1971 with a campaign that promoted the prohibition of illicit substances and implemented policies to discourage the overall production, distribution, and consumption. The War on Drugs and the U.S. drug policy has experienced the most significant and complex challenges between criminal law and the values of today’s society. With implemented drug polices becoming much harsher over the years in order to reduce the overall misuse and abuse of drugs and a expanded federal budget, it has sparked a nation wide debate whether or not they have created more harm than good. When looking at the negative consequences of these policies not only has billions of dollars gone to waste, but the United States has also seen public health issues, mass incarceration, and violent drug related crime within the black market in which feeds our global demands and economy. With this failed approach for drug prohibition, there continues to be an increase in the overall production of illicit substances, high rate of violence, and an unfavorable impact to our nation.

The American “War on Drugs” war created to keep an exorbitant amount of people behind bars, and in a subservient status. First, America has a storied history when it comes to marijuana use. However, within the last 50 years legislation pertaining to drug use and punishment has increased significantly. In the modern era, especially hard times have hit minority communities thanks to these drug laws. While being unfairly targeted by drug laws and law enforcement, minorities in America are having a difficult time trying to be productive members of society.

Nixon’s drug war, however, was a mere skirmish in comparison to the colossal efforts launched by the Ronald Reagan administration in the 1980s. Formally announced by President Ronald Reagan in 1982, the War on Drugs was marked by deep public concern, bordering on hysteria,, towards the nation’s drug problem. Under the leadership of President Reagan, the nation focused unprecedented energy and resources towards eliminating illicit drug use and trafficking.” (pp.

According to “The Apocalypse Now : The Lost War on Drugs”, the United States federal government began to become tough on “crime” especially drug offenses in the 1970’s under President Richard Nixon. Nixon stated that “drugs were public enemy #1” and that he was going to be tough on this crime. As a result, state level government began to create policies that were strict on drug offenses causing minimal sentencing for minor drug offenses. Instead of going after the root of the problem which was preventing drugs from entering the country, these laws targeting low income communities with predominantly black and Latino residents. In addition, these merciless laws were the cause of the significant amount of people, specifically men of color, in prison during the 1980’s “war on drugs” in the United States.

Doris Marie Provine writes her book, Unequal under law: Race in the War on Drugs, to inform her audience that race plays a key role in the War on Drugs. She writes about how this war has become a war on race rather than a war intended to improve drug abuse. Provine begins her book with some background on the first account of the “war on drugs”. She describes how the prohibition age was the beginning of this war which targeted women and blacks. In Unequal under law, Provine explains how different race groups have been given crime labels. Africans have been labeled as the cocaine abusers, Mexicans are known as the weed smokers, and Chinese are deemed the opium addicts. She argues that the government supported the war on drugs although it knew

Michelle Alexander draws conclusion from the Ronald Reagan Administration’s War on Drugs campaign which created stiffer laws that where unequally distributed between black and white drug offenders given white offenders the lesser of the sentence. Michelle Alexander (2012) suggests this was the seed that was planted strategically to create fear that there was a war going on in America’s backyard. Once the War on Drugs was announced the media monopolize on the campaign depicting drug-related crime with African-American faces. Meanwhile political figures capitalizing on the War

Past circumstances are also represented in Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow, where she candidly challenges the notion of a new color blind generation by exhibiting how America has redesigned a racial caste within mass incarceration. Specifically, she discusses the late 1900s War on Drugs and its essential role to the development of today’s racial injustice. President Richard Nixon’s call for war aimed to reduce the drug epidemic, but unintentionally sparked the public’s existing unease about individuals of color. At this time,

The war on drugs has been viewed as a discriminatory process because it has led to the captivity of more Africans Americans than slavery. American prisons house more African Americans due to discriminatory mandatory sentencing and misguided drug laws since the drug war began in the 1970s (page

The Drug Policy Alliance is an organization dedicated to making reforms to US drug laws, abolishing the failed the war on drugs, and advocating for harm reduction strategies. Located on their website, the article "Race and the Drug War", cites several troubling statistics and everyday realities that link the drug war to racism and discrimination. Among these, the fact that despite the rates of drug use being similar across racial lines, black Americans are more than three times as likely to be arrested for drug crimes. This is due to the fact that low-income, predominantly black neighborhoods are heavily patrolled for drug activity while higher-income neighborhoods are less scrutinized. The aim of the article is meant to persuade the reader

In the year 1971, President Richard Nixon was convinced that America’s number one enemy was drug abuse. As a result, in that year he declared war on drugs, there was a punishment for not only supplying drugs but purchasing them as well. Nixon believed America would be a more effective and prosperous country if it were completely drug free. The war on drugs was really a convenient cover for the undeclared war on race. There were several consequences and negative effects for African Americans due to the “war”, more extensive drug regulations, over-policing, driving while black, drug sweeps, and finally no warrants when searching and seizing. More than half of the people in

Although it seemed that this was nothing but a public relation awareness it became a strategy to lock-up anyone affiliated with the use/distribution. Since then, President Bush and Clinton followed the Regan anti-drug policies in which increased the spending and hired more law enforcement in efforts to prosecute those who have become a part of the drug problem. Watching the drug problem through a war like perspective gave the perception that the drug problem can be stopped with hostile policing to look out for and get rid of contraband and keeping the supply from flooding the streets. The widespread support on the drug war was explained so much in the political power these politician were receiving. Thus, the environment created was more for political gain to continue in office while these streets were becoming more widespread. In response to that the Reagan administration, moved quick to pass tough drug initiative by political support, leading to a tough issue for both Democrat and Republican Party; because if any of these parties didn’t mention the war on drugs as a state-to-state issue, could be seen as weak when trying to run for any political

The war on drugs is a is a compelling battle that many of the drug laws were motivated by racism. In San Francisco 1875, a law against opium was apparently based on the fear that Chinese men were luring white women into drug dens to have sex with them. This was followed by laws against cocaine that were thought to be motivated largely by racism towards blacks, and then by laws against marijuana motivated largely by biases against Mexicans. The war on drugs began in 1971 with Richard Nixon’s declaration and following presidents followed with varying degrees of enthusiasm. President Bill Clinton escalated the war in a way that has led directly to

The War on Drugs, like the war on Terrorism, is a war that America may not be able to afford to win. For over forty years the United States has been fighting the War on Drugs and there is no end in sight. It has turned into a war that is about politics and economics rather than about drugs and criminals. The victims of this war are numerous; but perhaps they are not as numerous as those who benefit from the war itself.

According to Michelle Alexander, why and how has the “war on drugs” developed over the last 40 years? What are the main political and economic factors that led to the war on drugs, and what are the main political and economic factors that shaped it as it developed over the last four decades? Draw on material from the Foner textbook chapters 25 through 28 to supplement Alexander’s discussion of the political and economic context.

The U.S. government eventually began establishing statutes against individuals possessing and using the drug. During a 1914 Congressional hearing, Congress approved the Harrison Act, which was a federal tax statute aimed at managing cocaine and attending to the dramatic increased addiction to the drug (Davis, 2011). Initially, southern legislators objected government regulation on cocaine due to its high demand and their suspicions over the power of the federal government (Davis, 2011). Southern legislators ultimately manipulated federal legislators through racist illusions to manage cocaine restrictions against Blacks only, although White individuals were the dominant proportion of addicts (Davis, 2011). Furthermore, advocates of the Harrison Act stated that “southern employers gave cocaine to black workers . . . and it caused the workers to be violent” (Davis, 2011, p. 380). Events like this guided the social processes of drugs and drug panics as society began developing racial stereotypes on cocaine because they identified Black individuals to be cocaine users and abusers (Faupel, Horowitz & Weaver, 2010). The drug panic of the 1980s led to the mass and disproportionate incarceration of Blacks and minorities.