preview

The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

Decent Essays

In October 2009, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) published an article about suspected cheating on the CRCT, Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests at Georgia schools. An AJC investigation noticed bizarre changes in test scores, recorded between spring of 2008 and that of 2009 in 19 public elementary schools, 12 of each were in Atlanta. Students from these schools had abnormally upgraded their performance (Perry & Vogel, 2009). It was later found out that 44 of 56 Atlanta public schools had cheated on the test, and 38 principals and 140 teachers were embroiled in this scandal. The reason given in the state report for justifying this event was that "…“a culture of fear” and “data-driven environment” under …show more content…

This experience, recorded as the largest cheating scandal in recent history, led to a widespread debate concerning standardized testing. Robert Schaffer, the public education director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest), an educational organization whose purpose is to ensure fairness and accuracy in student test taking, said: "The widespread cheating and test score manipulation problem is one of the ways politicians' fixation on high- stakes testing is damaging education quality and equity.". Other educational experts, in favor of the standardized testing, argued that "focusing on the cheating scandals ignores the larger picture." (Rich, 2013). So one might reasonably ask: "Is standardized testing doing the right job educating the population, measuring their abilities fairly and motivating them?" By the Glossary of Education Reform, a standardized test is any form of test that requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or a selection of questions from common bank of questions, in the same way, and that is scored in a “standard” or consistent manner, which …show more content…

Based on Rosenshine's studies in 2003, when results for the states with the "clearest" high-stakes policies were compared with those without high stakes, over a 4-year period, high-stakes standardized testing regimes were associated with greater increases in NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) scores.

While it is certainly true that under certain conditions, accountability testing can help student learning, there are some unintended outcomes that come along from the accountability testing regime. Cizek (2005) identified a range of negative consequences, including "a disproportionate focus on tested content, demoralization of teachers, and undue pressure on students". Because of the accountability testing regime, the anxiety and stress this regime provokes, the student drop-out rates have been increased and phenomenon as "teaching to the test" and cheating have become more common. Moreover, because of the accountability testing regime, teacher's morale has been diminishing in the past years, causing a dearth of desire to pursue or continue the

Get Access