The importance of following orders in a time of war. 1. Team member 2. Discipline 3. Causalities Conclusion: Following Orders in the Armed Services in a Time of War By: Pv2 Beasley Imagine being in an authoritative position in a war. Sounds cool right? Now imagine if your subordinates didn’t follow the orders you put out to them. You just imagined chaos right? In my opinion there is no limit to the chaos that could happen if just one soldier didn’t follow the orders given to him/her. It doesn’t matter what the rank of the soldier is. Following orders in the armed …show more content…
The team I’m referring to is simply a cooperative unit. Being a part of a team entitles you to be responsible for your actions, follow the orders of your subordinates, and perform them with honor integrity and selfless service. How can following orders in a time of war affect your team members? Imagine if you are on deployment to Iraq and you or a fellow soldier were told by your supervisor to fill up the gas cans and bring them down to the motor pool once they were filled and fill the vehicles up. What if you or the soldier decided to perform the order in your own time and you/ they forget. Now imagine your team is given an order to move out due to hostile parties moving in. Your team goes to the vehicles start them up and realize they are all low on gas. I hope that expresses the importance of following orders while being a part of the armed services in a time of war. The members of the armed forces are well know, and well respected for their discipline. Part of that discipline comes from the ability to follow the orders of your subordinates, even if they don’t feel like it or don’t agree with them. How disciplined can a soldier be if they don’t follow orders. The soldier in question can’t be very disciplined if they fail to follow instructions right? It goes against everything a soldier stands for. This makes them a danger to their team members, especially in a time of war. I do not think
To be successful or victorious in any war, the military have to make sure that men and women in uniforms, are well trained and discipline. Discipline is one of the key factors in any operation. Where there is discipline, there is orderliness, especially in the military. Combat soldiers are trained to kill, and defend themselves. Following ROE will help them target their enemies better. For example, in the Vietnam War, the Army operated under R0E, known as rules of engagement. This ROE were in place to conduct warfare that will comply with international and local laws within the conditions specified by high rank commanders. However, if rules of engagement are not put in place properly, followed or executed, it could be disastrous. An example could be the situation seen in Vietnam, when the U.S rules of engagement shifted towards some soft rules of engagement which caused a lot of American lives. A lot of the U.S soldiers were killed..(The changing combat rules of engagement: what is one American life worth? 2013). In any war, chain of command is very essential. The chain of command is an effective way to maintain order and to assign and make each accountable to a task. The same principle can be applied directly to
Soldiers feel unit leaders would make bad decisions in combat due to the micromanagement in the company and the Commander does not listen to recommendation from unit leaders.
Hello there, just wanted to get back to ya and touch basis on everything that’s going wrong in todays military. Ya know talking to that young handsome man Brian Robert Anthony Ware, he brought up a number of interesting points that, believe it or not, need be addressed. FIRST OF ALL, discipline in Americas Army has fallen precipitously since Vietnam. With loss of societal support from civilians, soldiers stopped receiving respect they require and long for. Over all that’s just one of many. When a nation you swore to protect turns on you because political power incites that what big army fights for is immorally correct. So as you can obviously see, this is one of many strong points not only for that handsome man Brian Ware, but also for the
The definition of disrespect is discourtesy, lack of respect, or rudeness and as every soldier should know, one must always show respect to a non commissioned officer. In the United States Army, there are standards and regulations soldiers must up hold, one of the main ones being, showing respect to a non commissioned officer. No matter the reason, whether you agree or disagree, you are not allowed to argue with, fight against, or question their judgment. If this happens, there will be repercussions and consequences from the actions that the soldier has taken. Actions taken to fix the soldier could be corrective training, negative counseling’s, or article 15s. An article fifteen, takes the money you have earned away from you and your family and it can give you extra duties and can flag you, which can keep you from traveling and going on leave. The importance of keeping correct protocol and United States military bearing on and off duty, is important because by showing disrespect to a non commissioned officer while in
A third way to put it would be in the sense of the military. People rely on those of higher ranks for their orders. Should their leader not give out those orders, the consequences could be dire (because the person on lower rank now giving the order would have less experience and probably less knowledge of whatever problem may arise). Or, should someone be giving a group of low rank men orders via radio on a covert ops mission, and suddenly decide to leave the radio unattended while he goes to the bathroom, the group of men would probably die.
Both the troop leading procedures and the orders process are foundational operational level processes in the United States Army. When used together, these procedures provide Army officers with the tools necessary to accomplish the mission and defend the nation. The orders process and the troop leading procedures are related in three ways. First of all, when the warning order is issued, the planning phase of the orders process serves to drive the next steps in the troop leading procedures. Next, just as the orders process drives the troop leading procedures, the troop leading procedures in turn direct the orders process by moving from the planning stage into the preparing and execution stages.
Due to the nature of the Army’s mission it’s difficult to apply complete autonomy without jeopardizing the execution of duty. Since the start of the war, higher command recognize the need to give junior leaders more decision making power at their level since they are at the forefront of the action. Higher command disseminates orders from their post without having close contact with soldiers. The army is slowly trying to create decentralized organizations by giving junior leaders greater authority over their soldiers. In some situations this has backfired, because junior leaders may lack experience or the right skill needed to execute their
Maintaining discipline is also an important leadership value. A command climate allowing soldiers to bend and stretch rules will in war lose a unified culture. Finally, it is imperative with a clear commander`s intent. When the operational approach and the end state turns blurry, the border between right and wrong, murder and killing, becomes blurry as well.
The following is my philosophy of command was created in hopes of providing a clear vision of where I want Battery K to be at the end of my tenure as Commanding Officer. This will serve as the guiding document of where I will focus my energies and the energy of the Battery to make things happen.
The law, rules, regulations, and policies, regulate discipline and good order within the Army, specifically, Titles 5, 10 and 32 of the United State Code (USC). According to ADRP 1-0, “The Army Ethic is the evolving set of laws, values, and beliefs, embedded within the Army culture of trust that motivates and guides the conduct of Army professionals bound together in common moral purpose.” (p. 2-3). In addition to laws, Army civilians and service-members are required to abide by, and act in accordance with Army Regulations (AR’s), and published policies and local directives. If it were so simple that the Army can publish guidelines, and everyone would follow them, then we would not have this issue.
The culture of the Army is one very particular pretty much consist of a centralized one that goes down to the single soldier itself, what I mean with this is that orders flow through a structure path all the time. There is no double standard in the army basically what is right is right for everybody and what is wrong is wrong for everybody. In the Army their culture is based in teamwork we are as strong as our weakest link. In the Army they have Noncommissioned Officer and Commissioned Officers, how it works the Commissioned Officers communicate their intent to the noncommissioned officers and the noncommissioned officers execute. In other words is a very structured organization that
9-32 The group was going to fracture because of the changing of roles within the group. The group came in with role expectations based on the different skills each soldier brought to the team. Per our text, these role expectations exist as a psychological contract, or ‘”an unwritten agreement that exist between employees and employers” (Robbins and Judge, 2017) In this case, there was unwritten agreement that certain soldiers would lead and others follows. Once this trust was broken it becomes hard to repair.
Authority and Obedience Thesis: We consciously or unconsciously obey authority in all walks of life on a daily basis. Obedience is when there is legitimate power, there is pressure to comply. Compliance with that which is required by authority; subjection to rightful restraint or control. Authority being the legal or rightful power; a right to command or enforce obedience on another.
The next step of the process is the chain of command; Officers are at the top warrants in the middle and enlisted at the bottom. Offices come up with a mission and pass that order down to the Enlisted NCOs (E-5 through E-9) (Warrant Officers do not control soldiers they are a specialist on a specific job). That NCO then has one job and that is to complete the mission that is passed down from the officer to him or her. Now I need you to picture yourself as a leader of young men and women getting ready to bored a plane to head over seas to fight in the middle east, all your soldiers families ask you to bring their husband, wife, mom, dad, son or daughter home alive and safe, you look at these family members in the eyes and have no choice but to tell them you will do everything in your power to ensure all your guys come home safe and in one piece! Next thing you know you are in a war zone rounds are flying over your head and you are being penned down by superior enemy fire, your training kicks in and you start to order your soldiers to make a flanking maneuver to suppress the enemy with two way directional fire while preforming buddy rushes and over run the enemy. What happens if your soldiers don’t listen, or don’t respect you enough to trust your plan to win this battle? As a NCO you have to have the respect of your soldiers while at the same time they must
The military recognizes that respect for authority is what maintains order and prevents the eruption of chaos and is hence willing to set an example for all who might be tempted to oppose their leaders, by administering these punishments first hand without any judicial representatives. Furthermore, Article 90 makes it clearly illegal to disobey an order by a military officer.