preview

The Book Thief Rhetorical Analysis

Decent Essays

The Book Thief, written by Australian novelist Markus Zusak, follows a young girl living in Nazi Germany, and employs innovative techniques to convey the central idea of the extremes of human behavior. This central idea was explored through stylistic techniques and conventions such as Death as the narrator, juxtaposition, irony, lack of chronological order, narrative voices, and themes, namely the power of words. In The Book Thief, Markus Zusak used narrative voices to convey extremes of human behavior. The characters through which he conveyed these innovated techniques are Death, the narrator, and Max Vandeburg, a central character. Death’s narrative voice was distant and provided juxtaposition on the kindness and cruelty of humans through …show more content…

As Death is not bound by time, he often interrupts the chronological order of the novel with prolepsis to make mentions of characters’ fates. Death uses prolepsis in part five where he alludes to Rudy’s death, “[Rudy] didn’t deserve to die the way he did,” and “He’d have been glad to witness her kissing his dusty bomb-hit lips.” Through these mentions, Death is highlighting how Rudy was cruelly killed as he did not deserve to die by being bombed since he was just a child. These mentions also juxtapose the kind and innocent things Rudy would do in the following five parts, such as giving a Jewish man bread despite starving himself. Death’s use of prolepsis was not always elongated, in part ten Death informs the reader what would happen at the very end, “A SMALL, SAD HOPE; No one wanted to bomb Himmel Street. No one would bomb a place named after heaven, would they? Would they?” This served to highlight how Death can underestimate the extremity of human behavior as he found it incredulous that anybody could bomb a place named after heaven. This bomb caused the death of everyone on Himmel Street besides Liesel Meminger. Death’s narrative interruptions allowed the reader to wonder why anyone would bomb Himmel Street or even kill innocent children who anything but …show more content…

Max Vandenburg was able to escape Stuttgart by carrying Adolf Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ which highlights Hitler’s hatred for Jewish people. The words in this story enforced the cruelty of human’s, the German’s who succumbed to Hitler’s words became Nazi’s. In this context, it can be seen that words can be used in a negative way, however, Max would later paint over the pages of ‘Mein Kampf’ to write his own story, ‘The Standover Man’ which he would gift to Liesel, “Max had cut out a collection of pages from Mein Kampf and painted them over in white.” This novel was an act of kindness for Liesel who was fascinated by words yet could not buy novels or obtain them legally. Max’s second novel ‘The Word Shaker’ was also gifted to Liesel when he’d left for Dachau, in this he discusses the power of words and how they can be used in a cruel way, “Yes, the Fuhrer, decided that he would rule the world with words….. He watched them grow, until eventually, great forests of words had risen throughout Germany.” Through ‘Mein Kampf’, ‘The Standover Man’ and ‘The Word Shaker’ the reader can understand the power of words on human

Get Access