1. How does Teletech currently use the hurdle rate? Teletech currently uses the hurdle rate in the assessment of the firm’s economic profit and NPV. The rate is based on an estimate of Teletech’s WACC. Currently, the hurdle rate for Teletech is 10.407%, using data in Figure 1. The case rounds this number to 10.41% 2. What are the segment WACCs for Teletech? What assumptions do you have to make to do these calculations? Using the data in Figure 1, we can calculate the WACC for the Telecom Services division and the Products and Systems division of Teletech. Telecom Services WACC is 10.404% while Products and Services WACC is 10.417%. Assumptions need to be made for the Cost of Equity. We used the corporate rate of 11.766% …show more content…
What are the implications of this view? What are the arguments for and against this view? Helen Buono states, “All money is green. Investors cannot know as much about our operations as we do. To them the firm is an opaque box; they hire us to take care of what is inside the box, and judge us by the dividends coming out of the box.” While I cannot refute that the color of money is of a green hue, I can critique that the cost of all money is not the same. Her “green money” statement does not factor in the risk involved in projects. This view implies that a single hurdle rate may deprive an under profitable division of investments in order to channel more funds into a more profitable division. While this is sound logic, certain situation exist where projects will go unfunded that do create value to the company. Helen also goes on to explain that if one segment’s hurdle rate is lower than the corporate hurdle rate, the company would be destroying shareholder value. The whole is a sum of its parts. What if Teletech has the opportunity to invest in a project that creates value at a hurdle rate below the firm wide 10.41%, but above the segment’s hurdle rate? This investment would create value in this segment, but in the strategy of one hurdle rate, the project would be overlooked. 5. Is Helen Buono right that management would destroy value if all of the firm’s assets were redeployed into only the telecommunications business segment? Helen
3. Should Midland use a single corporate hurdle rate for evaluating investment opportunities in all of its divisions? Why of why not?
What risk-free rate and the risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of equity?
Because we have not been notified of any substantial changes within the company’s financing agenda or asset acquisition goals, we find it safe to assume that Telus will continue to use the same financing weights in the near future. Another thing that we believe Telus should consider is avoiding the issuance of Preferred Stock in the future. Although this type of stock is less restricted, it can considerably affect the company’s overall cost of capital based on a higher after-tax cost and given that this type of stock is not tax
a. What hurdle rates would be assigned to projects in the three risk categories for the company
1) I think the case may lack some data needed for calculating an accurate WACC. Do we assume an approximate WACC?
How firms estimate their cost of capital: The WACC for a firm is 13.00 percent. You know that the firm's cost of debt capital is 10 percent and the cost of equity capital is 20%. What proportion of the firm is financed with debt?
d. Does the firm appear to have an effective corporate governance structure? Explain any shortcomings.
18. If the managers of COA only invest in projects that have a profitability index greater than 1.0, then:
WACC = (1-corporate tax rate)(Pretax rate of cost of debt)(Market value of debt/ D+E))+ After tax rate of cost of equity(market value of equity/D+E))
In a market with taxation, the value of the levered firm equals to the value of the unlevered firm plus the present value of interest tax shield.
The complete list of companies statistics reviewed along with the comparable businesses ( “Comps” ) selected for use in the analysis can be found in Appendix A. Comps for the Telecommunications Services segment are highlighted in light orange, and the Comps for the Products and Systems segment are highlighted in light blue. Initially statistics (Including Betas, and equity debit ratios) for the Comps was averaged to calculate the individual WACCs.
The result for the WACC of the Exploration & Production division is 8.04%. For this calculation we have to compute different variables.
projects a company does choose to invest its resources in are likely to generate profit
Comparable companies were needed in order to calculate the WACC for each business segment. The comparable companies were chosen using the following measurements: similar product lines, revenues, and bond ratings. Alltel Corporation, Sprint Corporation, and Bellsouth Corporation were determined to be comparable companies for Teletech’s Telecommunications Segment. Avaya Inc., Lucent Technologies, and Commscope Inc. were comparable comps for the Product and Systems Segment. (see Exhibit 1). The three comps for each segment were than averaged to create an appropriate WACC for each separate segment of Teletech.
LECTURES ON CORPORATE FINANCE - (Second Edition) © World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. http://www.worldscibooks.com/economics/6188.html