The delivery of quality patient care is the utmost goal in the health care industry. To provide such purpose, evidence-based education of the health care providers and the continuity of proper skills and competencies should be current at all times. Many healthcare organizations are focusing on the fall and pressure injury prevention due to its tie to the reimbursement claim. However, there are areas that need attention and equally important, one example is the appropriate use of physical restraint. A significant numbers of providers thought that if you know how to secure the restraint, you are compliant. The skill does not end on how to tie, but critical judgement is extremely important in treating and managing a patient in need or on
b. Restraints should be used as a last resort on patients that are at a high risk for hurting either themselves or others. If this particular hospital is found to be overusing their restraints, they should look into why this is happening and where it is happening most often. What is the patient to staff ratio? Are acuities being considered when staffing the unit? If restraints are being overused, maybe a shortage of staff could be to blame.
As health care workers we are under a legal obligation to protect an individual from any kind of abuse, whether it is physical, financial, emotional, sexual or psychological .Legislation, policies and procedures exist to promote a safer working environment and reduce the potential for risks occurring. They are tailored for the needs of each setting, known and understood by employers and employees and reviewed on a regular basis.
Many of these inpatient falls can be prevented when following the proper fall prevention measures. Not only does patient safety make preventing falls a priority but the financial impact these falls have on an institution make it a priority as well.
Any of these issues have the potential to extend the patients length of stay in the hospital. The restraints have the potential to make the patient more agitated, thus increasing his risk of injury. Understanding the nursing-sensitive indicators can greatly contribute to a better outcome for all patients.
Hospital data on the use of restraint can also be analyzed to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. This information could be scrutinized to determine if restraints were truly warranted in that particular situation, or if another method could have or should have been utilized first. Documentation should also be examined to determine if the patient was adequately cared for during this time period. In my hospital, the patient must be released from the restraints at least every two hours, and must be toileted at that time. The nurse must also do range of motion exercises with the extremities affected by the restraints. The skin and circulation should be assessed at this time. Every hour, the nurse is required to check the pulses in the extremity affected by the restraint. The nurse’s documentation should reflect that all of these assessments were performed and the appropriate precautions were taken.
A restraint is any physical or chemical measure in the healthcare setting to keep a patient from being free to move (Craven, Hirnle & Jensen, 2013). Nurses are presented with dilemmas in deciding whether to use restraints to protect the patient from falls, harming themselves or others, suppress agitation and to facilitate treatment. Improper usage and misconceptions of restraining can have negative consequences including physical and psychological issues. Physical and psychological disadvantages from restraining could include low blood pressure, decreased circulation, thrombosis, constipation, urinary incontinence, depression, fear and increased confusion (Yeh et al., 2004). Educating nurses may reduce restraint usage by increasing
Patients that we received often wants to either harm themselves or others, and these patients are also considered violent which lead to the frequent use of restraints and seclusion. Using these methods represent a danger to not only staff but also for the patients. Many injuries occur during these confrontations. The need to minimize the use of restraints and seclusion on the unit is necessary for patients and staff safety.
J’s scenario is pressure ulcer. From analyzing Mr. J’s case one can see the correlation between the use of restraints and pressure ulcers. Obtaining data listed on the Braden Scale such as moisture, mobility, activity, and nutrition are important when assessing for pressure ulcer risks. Once the collected data indicates the patient is high risk then the established pressure ulcer protocol needs to be followed. Nurses will need to minimize friction, support bony surfaces, manage moisture, and maintain adequate nutrition to advance quality patient care. The other nursing-sensitive indicator in this case is restraints. As I have mentioned earlier the use of restraints in Mr. J’s case seems appropriate as he pose great fall risk which may further complicate his current health condition. However, it is important to perform a complete assessment on the parameters for restraint such as cognitive functioning, history of dementia, physical impairment, and drug interactions to determine the need for restraints. When restraint is clinically indicated, and the benefits outweigh the risks then protocol for restraints has to be followed. Once the patient is restrained, it is standard practice that restraints are to be removed as soon as possible, and the patient in restraints will need assistance to change position every two hours. B) To improve quality patient care throughout the hospital, the quality improvement department should scrutinize, and keep track of the
For example, a lap belt intended to prevent an individual from falling out of a wheelchair is considered a physical restraint if the person is unable to willingly remove the belt. Arguments in favor of physical restraints promote their use for fall prevention, control of aggressive behavior, and protection of treatment devices such as feeding tubes (XXX). However, the use of physical restraints has also been linked to injury, pressure ulcers, incontinence, cognitive decline, and death (XXX). In recent years, there has been a decrease in physical restraints because it has been widely accepted as a sign of poor quality care, but this decline is not observed uniformly across all populations (Kunetzka, 2014; Phillips, 2000). Residents with dementia, physical impairments, and a history of falls continue to be at risk of being restrained in long-term care settings (Grunier, 2008). Although the utilization of restraints in these populations is prevalent, the safety and efficacy of these practices is inconclusive and the ramifications of such restraints can be severe (Agens,
At the center of a successful falls prevention program is an organizational culture that values safety for both patients and associates. Creating a culture of safety is one of the key interventions that reduce harm for patients in a heath care setting (Quigley & White, 2013). If a health care organization fails to protect patients from harm, there are both legal and financial implications. In the effort to prevent harm to patients and hospital acquired injuries, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced pay-for-performance and the value-based purchasing program in 2008. These non-payment programs, withhold payments to organizations that report hospital acquired injuries such as falls (Rheaume & Fruh, 2015). A reduction is reimbursements leaves a health care organization vulnerable to financial instability. A lack of financial resources can lead to staffing reductions and lack of investment in patient safety interventions; both have been shown to lead to poor patient outcomes (Trepanier & Hilsenbeck, 2014).
That being stated, if a patient must be placed on restraints, qualified professionals must have a comprehensive understanding of patient outcomes that correspond with the use of restraints. First and foremost, skin integrity is placed at risk if proper placement and management of patient care while in restraints is not implemented as with the case of Mr. J. There is numerous evidence based research studies conducted that correlate the use of restrains with an increase in pressure ulcers (Baumgarten, Margolis, Localio, Kagan, Lowe, Kinosian, Abbuhi & Abbuhi, 2010).
Falls in a health care setting are costly to the patient, the health care facility and may affect the reimbursement that insurance gives to hospitals, yet they are preventable. Falls can be minor with just a few bumps and bruises or they can be major which can result in death. Not only are falls harmful to the patient but there is a lot of money and time that gets added up after a fall occurs *** There are many factors as to why a fall could take place, but being aware of the risk that a patient is a fall risk from the beginning can help avoid a fall from ever occurring. Accurately identifying a patient as a fall risk and communicating to other staff within 24 hours of admission is key to help in the prevention of falls.
While the use of physical restraint on elderly patients is necessary in specific situations, the practice should be very limited at all times. Although it will continue to be used worldwide, measures must be taken by all healthcare providers to gradually minimize the use of restraints in healthcare facilities, reduce the risks that are associated with the practice, offer reasonable alternatives for patient care, and ensure the safety of the patients as well as their caregivers.
In today’s health care system, “quality” and “safety” are one in the same when it comes to patient care. As Florence Nightingale described our profession long ago, it takes work and vigilance to ensure we are doing the best we can to care for our patients. (Mitchell, 2008)
A retrospective review of the administration of intramuscular ketamine as a chemical restraint in the prehospital setting was led by Burnett, Peterson, Stellpflug, Engebretsen, Glasrud, Marks and Frascone (2015).