The word deontology comes from the Greek word “deontos” which means duty (Adams, 2011). Deontology can be defined as doing what is morally correct regardless of the final results as long as they abide by the moral principles. Certain actions, like lying, are never allowed regardless if its outcomes benefit the purpose and no harm is caused. The theory states that whether an action is ethical and follows the moral rules, depends on the intentions behind the decisions (Pieper, 2008). So for an action to be “good” and morally right, it must have been performed at goodwill and abide to moral values. Immanuel Kant was a renowned philosopher known for his theories and his deontological way of thinking. Deontology was also known as kantianism …show more content…
It’s the nurse's duty to advocate for her patient and to make sure that the patient understands and ask questions if necessary.
Overall, deontology is based upon not just by following universal rules or performing what is ought to do, but by respecting human beings as rational beings as well. Deontology judges the ethical motive of an action not by its consequences, merely by the reasoning behind it.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism, in the contrary, is based on the principle of utility or usefulness. Utility is what encourages an agent to act in a particular way (Tuckett, 1998). Utility can be explained as maximizing the good like pleasure and happiness and minimizing the bad like pain and evil, all leading to the greater good for all parties involved. It weights the consequences of the actions equally between the ones involved, and the ethical solution would be to follow the greater good for most if not all the parties involved.
Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are known for their theories about utilitarianism. Both of them agree that the ethical right thing to do would be to maximize utility in any given situation. Yet, both of them disagree when it came to defninig pleasure. Bentham’s theory generalizes pleasure as just the same type of emotion felt by anyone and in any situation. Mill’s theory on the other hand stated that there are two different types of pleasure: the higher intellectual pleasure and the lower physical pleasure
Deontological moral systems are characterized by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. To make the correct moral choices, we have to understand what our moral duties are and what correct rules exist to regulate those duties. When we follow our duty, we are behaving morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. Typically in any deontological system, our duties, rules, and obligations are determined by God. Being moral is thus a matter of obeying God. Deontological moral systems typically stress the reasons why certain actions are performed. Simply following the correct moral rules is often not sufficient; instead, we have to have the correct motivations. This might allow a person to not be
“Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to do a particular action just because the action, itself, is inherently right and not through any other sorts of calculations – such as the consequences of the action” (Boylan, 2009, p. 171). In many aspects deontology is contrasted with utilitarianism. Deontology is based upon principle and does not calculate the consequences (Boylan, 2009, p. 171). Deontology attracts those seeking a stronger moral attraction because it refers to commanding rather than commending and commanding is a stronger structure (Boylan, 2009, p. 172). The
Immanuel Kant's deonotological ethical theory assesses if actions are moral based on the person's will or intention of acting. Kant's theory can be categorized as a deonotological because "actions are not assessed to be morally
With this theory Michael Boylan explains that, “no calculations, such as consequences of the action can be measured.” The act should only be based on duty and must be consistent with their absolutism. This may lead to the action of a deontologist turning out morally wrong. This theory often contradicts the other ethical theory utilitarianism. Michael Boylan explains that, “ the result of deontology acts on the moral of command rather than the possibility of the greater good”.
Deontology come from the Greek word for duty. Deontology is the belief that good outcomes are largely irrelevant to moral concerns. Deontology takes away the effects of our actions and places the focus on the actions themselves. Actions that are prohibited in deontology include lying, killing, and dishonesty (Williams and Arrigo, 2012). In our example, Slager was responsible for the death of another, lied about how the incident occurred, and was overall dishonest.
In contrast, utilitarianism is an ethics systems based on pleasure and well-being for all parties involved. This systems recommends making the decision that will bring the greatest amount of well-being to the greatest number of people
Deontology is defined as an ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. (Yourdictionary.com, 2016), (Kant, 1785)
Deontological moral theory is a Non-Consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists believe the ends always justify the means, deontologists assert that the rightness of an action is not simply dependent on maximizing the good, if that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a situation where there are four critical condition patients in a hospital who each need a different organ in order to survive. Then, a healthy man comes to the doctor's office for a routine check-up. According to consequentialism, not deontology, the doctor should and must sacrifice that one man in order to save for others. Thus, maximizing the good.
Second, deontology focuses on the logic of a moral judgment. Suppose we allowed lying, so that instead of telling people they ought not to lie, we tell them that lying is fine. So we all decide to follow the moral judgment that "Lying is right." Now, when you tell me something, I consider that you might be lying, so I cannot EVER trust what you say. Because of that conclusion, I realize that you cannot even lie to me! That is, the rule that allows lying makes lying impossible. That is the logic that
Deontological moral systems also place some stress on the reasons why certain actions are being performed. Simply following the correct moral rules is often not enough - instead, we have to have the correct motivations. This would definitely allow any person to not be known as immoral even though they have broken a moral rule, but only so long as they were motivated to adhere to some correct moral duty. Maybe the most important thing to know about deontological moral systems is that their moral main rules are definitely different from any consequences which following those rules might have. Plus if you have a moral duty not to lie, then lying is always wrong - even if that results in harm to others. For example, you would be acting immorally if
Deontology looks at actions as either right or wrong; states that rule humans uses reason to determine whether something is good or bad, right or wrong. Deontology believes morality is in the act, rationality leads to right and wrong, and the use of the maxim of universality. The use of the maxim of universality to decide whether an action is right or wrong; this states that an action is right if at the same time, you'd be happy for everybody else in the world.
Is it right for our society to be held for immoral behavior when it is already being displayed in our society and within the cultural areas in our lives? Right or wrong ways are always among our society, and when we are dealing with an ethical theory deontology system seems more established. This ethics theory, conducts a matter of right and wrong. This indicates our behavior, whether it is morally or immoral and which deals with human relationships to see how we comprehend towards others and how they comprehend toward us. Human activities normally depict one’s ethical nature, adhering to the moral values of the deontology theory. John Stuart Mill, states “that each individual got benefit only from the nobleness of others, with his own nobleness serving to reduce his own happiness.”(Mill, J. S. 2008) We have happiness and unhappiness that are developed as a consequence of an action; normally people judge their actions solely whether if it is considered right or wrong by virtue of their consequences and what matters in life. With this I do agree that people should be liable for their immoral act. In this essay I will explain the core principle of deontology theory, and the principle that supports the question that were purposed and express an objective on the basis of that argument.
Deontology names a type of ethical theory that judges human practices based on whether they are consistent with certain duties that the theory holds as intrinsically moral. Consequences are irrelevant
It posits that decisions must to be made with the consideration of an individual?s duties and the rights of others. When applying deontology, it requires individuals to adhere to rules and at the same time to perform their duties. If I show a group od individual the wrong way, they will be taught it is the right way. It is the human morality of right and wrong and not the consequential method of it. They will learn that this is how out leader taught us.
Deontology is an ethical theory that focus on the will of a person. It is a philosophy about how people ought to act. Deontology is non-consequentialism. People’s action should not play the role in evaluating the act of morality. “Duties and obligation” are the target to the will of a person. There are two important rules in deontology. The first rule is never treat people as a means to an end in achieving a goal because it is disrespectful. The second rule is act in the manner that maxim the action with the intent to developing into a universal law. Immanuel Kant is a philosopher of ethics. According to an article titled "Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals" Immanuel Kant (2008) reads, "an action that is done from duty doesn’t get its moral