preview

Nt1310 Unit 1 Patient 1

Decent Essays

DISCUSSION

For each of the seven patients, I have come up with the diagnosis and explanations for what the next steps are for each patient. I used the module book for most of the explanations that help to explain what the next steps are and what further tests they require.
Patient 1 has a negative diagnosis, as all the cells are lower than 33%. Their average nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio was 13.32%, which is the lowest overall and is below 33%. This means patient 1 is not required to have any further tests done. They will just need to come for screening tests every 3 years. Patient 1’s cells were all blue, which means only a haematoxylin stain, was used. The blue indicates nuclei.

Patient 2 was diagnosed as low-grade dyskaryosis for one …show more content…

This drug works by damaging the DNA in cancer cells and stopping them from multiplying. It binds together the strands of DNA so that cells can’t grow and divide (Cancer Research UK, 2015).
Papanicolaou test fails to detect, on average, 50% of clinically significant pre-cancers and cancers that are present at the time of testing. The interpretation of Papanicolaou smears is subjective, and cellular abnormalities may be missed because of the reader's fatigue and distraction. Another drawback of the Papanicolaou test is the need for highly skilled cytotechnologists, the training of whom takes several years (Louvanto, Chevarie-Davis, Ramanakumar, Franco, & Ferenczy, 2014).
This means there are problems with the Pap smear, as it doesn’t always recognise pre-cancerous cells at an early stage. Especially if they might have missed a cervical screening in between. In addition, some pre-cancerous cells may not be picked up until three or four tests later.
However even though there are many problem with the Pap smear, the most important error is failure of women to get a Pap smear (Dziura, 2009). As it is harder to monitor any changes in the cervical cancer if you don’t turn up for regular

Get Access