Consequentialist and non- consequentialist
Consequentialist :
Consequentialist or teleological consideration is about result of an action, which can affect an act by an individual or a group. ( T&K, p.30). There are two types of major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and Utilitarianism. Universal E/E: everyone should act in their own self interest, the consequences of an action will affect all the parties involved. Universal egoist refers for all of us or for all human being to act on it’s self-interest. A moral ethics which imply for everyone. Universal ethical egoism is the universal doctrine that all persons should pursue their own interests exclusively. Problem with this theory is how to figure out what is in
…show more content…
Distinct to act utilitarians, who try to maximize the usefulness by applying individual acts, rule utilitarian believe that we can maximize the utility only by setting up a certain set of rules. the set of rules are formed for greatest good for all humanity, correct moral rules will produce better result, and give a direction to individual actions. And individual action can be evaluate accordance to these set of rules. Some criticisms of this position point out that if the Rules take into account more and more exceptions, RU collapses into AU. More general criticisms of this view argue that it is possible to generate "unjust rules" according to the principle of utility. For example, slavery in Greece might be right if it led to an overall achievement of cultivated happiness at the expense of some mistreated individuals
Non-consequentialist:
Unlike consequentialist , the action opposed to outcomes , the theory is about action it-self. Non-consequentialist are not concern about outcomes or consequences, they are more focus on human action. For example , the standards of morality in this theory is to follow the set rules define or design by supernatural powers (God, Goddess) without having the concern about the outcomes. Than the action is right and the doer is good people. There are two theories in no-consequentialist category, Act non-consequentialist and Rule non-consequentialist.
Act non-consequentialist:
…show more content…
But it was believed that de could be cultivated and established in positive way. For the moral self- cultivation, Confucius worked out for inclusive programme. Confucius moral philosophy and his teaching gave the China a new directions of civilization and stability. According Confucius human being are social in nature, one is bound with family, community and society. And it has different roles and responsibility in social scenario. In Confucianism there are five cardinal relationship between Ruler and subject, Father and son, Husband and wife, Elder brother and younger brother, Friend and friend. Every relation has a duty of care and responsibilities. Confucius harmony based on two virtues namely “Ren” and “Li”, Ren translated as benevolence and goodness while Li is ritual propriety. Ren is about the development of relationship between individual and community. Li is a virtue that must be cultivated to make one fully participant in
There are four types of egoism (ETHICAL EGOISM). The first is Psychological egoism and it is the view that humans are always motivated by self-interest. An example of this is …….. The second is Ethical egoism. This is when you should do something that is in your own self-interest. An example of this is performing a task for someone because you are getting paid to do it. Third is Individual ethical egoism. It states that everyone should act in their own best self-interest. An example of this is a policeman. He/she believes that they should do what is in their best interest just because of their role in society. Finally there is Universal ethical egoism. It states that everyone should always act in their own best self-interest, regardless of the interests of others, unless their interests
The modern theory of utilitarianism is a type of consequentialism--"the view that normative properties depend only on consequences;" that is to say, in other words,
Its general outline is the moral rightness of an action is determined by outcomes. For example, a student was struggling to help an old lady who has fallen on ground while other people do not even care about it and a student had to leave in a hurry. However, he helped her and a lady offered cordial thanks. As the example is illustrated, the act is good if its consequences are good, but if its consequences are bad then the act is wrong. Shaw et al(2013, p. 63) emphasizes that consequentialists determine what is right by weighing the ratio of good to bad that an action will produce. According to consequentialists, the decision of the Dean of Harvard Business School is simply explained as the result of decision which rejected all applicants who attempted to access the information derive a conclusion which Dean Clark observed their belief, principles and it shows making own decisions is always with responsibility for actions. In addition, utilitarianism will be applied on this case because this theory is in contrast with egoism which can be defined by Shaw et al(2013, p. 63) as egoism contends that an act is morally right if and only if it best promotes an agent’s long term interest.’. It means self-interesting is most important key point whether going into action or not. However, Utilitarianism is focused on more about ‘achieving the
There are two basic kinds of egoism, there is ethical egoism and there is psychological egoism. These two different forms of egoism are different because ethical egoism is the normative ethical position that what is moral is to be done in self-interest. This is different from psychological egoism which states specifically that people will only act in their own self-interest. Ethical egoism is broken up into two forms. There is act egoism and Rule egoism. Act egoism says
David Shoemaker provides two theories of egoism in the text--psychological theory and ethical theory. Psychological egoism is the claim that all actions are done solely for the sake of one’s own self-interest. Ethical egoism simply states that all actions ought to be done for the sake of one’s own self interests. Shoemaker elaborates stating ethical egoism is the more attractive theory.
The premise of this theory is that an act is right if and only if it produces the greatest possible average outcome for everyone. Egoism and Utilitarianism are similar in the fact that they both make judgements that are purely dependent on the consequences. The largest difference between the two theories is that egoism has no primary regard for how actions affect others, while utilitarianism is concerned with the overall outcome for all.
Consequentialism and non-consequentialism are both action based ethical frameworks that people can use to make ethical judgments. Consequentialism is based on examining the consequences of one’s actions as opposed to non-consequentialism which is focused on whether the act is right or wrong regardless of the outcome (Burgh, Field & Freakley, 2006). The three sub-categories of consequentialism are altruism, utilitarianism and egoism.
“People act for many reasons; but for whom, or what, do or should they act—for themselves, for God, or for the good of the planet?” (Moseley) An egoist would argue that one acts for one’s own self. More specifically, an ethical egoist is one who thrives to improve ones own self being, with much respect to morality. Ethical Egoism is the theory that one should pursue his or her own interest above all the rest. It is the idea that all persons should act from their own self interest in relation to morality.
“Egoism is the normative idea that each person ought to pursue his or her own self-interest exclusively” (Rachels 77). In other words, what makes one’s actions moral is if they are acting in their own self-interest only. It is the radical view that states that one’s only duty is to promote one’s own self-interest. This theory does not suggest that one should act in their own interest as well as others best interest, but, according to Rachels, there is only one principle to follow and that
Egoism: is a theory of ethics that focuses on achieving goals that benefit or brings pleasure or greatest good to oneself. In other words it focuses on self-interest, however egoism is opposite to Altruism, which is not strictly based on self-interest, but also includes the interest of others. There are two kinds of Egoism; Ethical Egoism, Psychological Egoism.
Does any of this even matter in the end? Consequentialism, deontological, virtue ethics, care ethics, and existential ethics are all philosophical approaches that try to answer these questions on how we should be and how we should act. The Consequentialism Debate Consequentialism and deontological are two opposing philosophical approach to determining what behavior is appropriate and or moral. The consequentialism ethical theory is a form of utilitarian philosophy. Utilitarian
On a contrasting note, the opposing ethical theory to utilitarianism is the ethical egoist theory or perspective. The ethical egoist perspective is the idea that “everyone ought to be selfish or self interested” (Rosenstand G-3). This theory supports the idea that all people should look out for
1. Consequentialist moral theories see the moral rightness or wrongness of actions as a function of their results. If the consequences are sufficiently good, the action is right; if they are sufficiently bad, the action is wrong. However, nonconsequentialist theories see other factors as also relevant to the determination of right and wrong.
Descriptive egoism holds that for each individual, there is only one ultimate aim survival and the betterment of the sole individual based on their own hierarchical principles.
Universal egoism is the most commonly offered by egoist because its’ universally based, applicable to all. Universal egoist feel that