preview

Nike and Under Armour (Accounting Paper)

Better Essays

RUNNING HEAD: NIKE & UNDER ARMOUR FINANCIALS

Nike & Under Armour Financial Analysis

Table of Contents

Background……………………….……………………………………………………………………..3

Progress in last year…………………………………………………………………………………..3-5

Profitability/Debt Ratios…………………………...………………………………………………...5-7

Net Profit Margin………………………..……………………………………………………….5

Gross Profit Margin………………………...…………………………………………………….6

Return on Equity………………………….…………………………………………………...6-7

Earnings per Share……………………..………………………………………………………...7

Liquidity/Debt Ratios………………………………………………………….…….……………….7-9

Current Ratio……………………………………………………………………………………8

Debt to Equity…………………………………………………………………………………..8

Interest Coverage……………………………………………………………………………….9

Efficiency …show more content…

It appears that Nike is taking a few steps in the right directions through innovation and restructuring of their workforce to better position themselves financially in the long term. Under Armour has proven year over year that they are indeed a growth company. As their brand recognition and product availability increases so do their revenues. Under Armour achieved a growth in net revenue by over 18 percent, increased net income by 22 percent (suggesting financial discipline) all leading to their ability to sustain growth year over year (Under Armour 10K, 2009). This considerable increase in net revenue is attributed to an increase in apparel and the introduction of footwear in the first quarter of 2009 (2009). Although Under Armour has only been around 14 years they have only been traded publicly since 2005 (2009). The five key growth drivers for Under Armour are: “Men’s and Women’s Apparel, Footwear, International and Direct-to-Consumer” (Under Armour 10K, 2009, pg.1). In 2009 Apparel revenues Under Armour in 2009 drastically focused on improving their inventory position, strengthening their balance sheet and improving the efficiency of their working capital (2009). Under Armour’s inventory turnover ratio of 2.68 in 2009 compared to 2.13 in 2008 indicates they are more efficient at moving inventory more quickly through production to the end consumer reducing storage and other related carrying costs (Libby, Libby, Short,

Get Access