preview

Neo Conservatism In The 1960's

Decent Essays

A former Republican Irving Kristol , is often called the God father of Neoconservative in the United States, because of his involvement and movement that lead to His articulation and defense of conservative ideals against the dominant liberalism of the 1960s , who influenced generations of intellectuals and policymakers and contributed to the resurgence of the Republican Party in the late 1960s and its electoral successes in the 1980s. He was the quintessential organizer and spark plug of the movement, which took on various organizational forms over the years, and which he best summed up as a persuasion. His theories centered around the limits of public interest and welfare programs of the 1960s and 1970s, which he claimed only worked in theory, …show more content…

Neo-conservatism was largely born out of alliance between classical Liberals and Social Conservatives in the late 19th and early 20th Century. It includes a collection of political ideologies including Fiscal Conservatism, free market or economic Liberalism, Social Conservatism, Libertarianism, Bio-Conservatism and Religious Conservatism. As far as their intellectual predecessors, neoconservatives include the ancient Greek historian Thucydides for his steadfast realism in military matters and his skepticism toward democracy, as well as Alexis de Tocqueville, the French author of Democracy in America, who described and analyzed both the bright and the bad sides of democracy in the United States. More modern influences tend to include the German-born American political philosopher Leo Strauss and several of his students, such as Allan Bloom; Bloom’s student Francis Fukuyama; and a small band of intellectuals who in their youth were anti-Stalinist communists before becoming liberals disillusioned with liberalism. The latter included Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, and Norman Podhoretz, among others. He believed that the role of the government was to guide the people. Kristol has little use for individual rights, taken apart from public duties, he did not view the American revolution as a radical assertion of …show more content…

Many of his essays were on the history ideas. Most neocons believe that the US has allowed dangers to gather by not spending enough on defense and not confronting threats aggressively enough. One such threat, they contend, was Saddam Hussein and his pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. Since the 1991 Gulf War, neocons have advocated for Hussein's removal. Most neocons share unwavering support for Israel, which they see as crucial to US military sufficiency in a volatile region. They also see Israel as a critical piece of democracy in a region ruled by dictators. They believe that authoritarianism and theocracy have allowed anti-Americanism to flourish in the Middle East, neocons advocate the democratic transformation of the region, starting with Iraq. They also believe the US is unnecessarily hampered by multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, which they do not trust to effectively deal with threats to global

Get Access