Movie Analysis : The Movie ' Capote '

For example, the reader is introduced to Helen as a baby. Meanwhile, in the motion picture the watcher is introduce to Helen when she’s six years old. This a major difference because the reader views how Helen started unlike the watcher of the movie. Another example, in the story Helen is pictured as a filthy mess, but in the film she is always in a nice set of clothes. This is a very important change because it shows how a person depicts Helen. Lastly, Annie is haunted by nightmares of her brother at the State Court house. In the book their is great deal of flashbacks in the story, but in the movie their is only one. This shows how Annie had to fight the voices in her head and the guilt of her “ killing” her brother. Even with these differences, it still tells the amazing story of Helen

“It was a nice day. Blue sky. Not a cloud.” (p.247). Grant was describing the setting for the day of the execution. A man, wrongly accused and wrongly sentenced, was going to die on the perfect day. This quote, though not significant to any other part of the novel, stood out to me because it showed hope for the day. It created a sense of happiness and calmness on an otherwise horrific event.

Most people didn’t even know this town, Holcomb, Kansas, existed. Capote uses imagery by thoroughly describing the things that help point out that nothing happens and nobody stops in this town. For something like a family being murdered to happen in a town that only the residents had heard of, that’s a pretty big deal and anyone would be able to sense the imagery in that

Majority of movies don’t follow along with the books as an example my class read “The Outsiders” was written by S.E. Hinton and the director for the movie was Francis Ford Coppola. “The Outsiders” was about seven friends that were greasers, three whom were siblings, a greaser is a person who has long greasy hair, live on south side of town, and they ain't rich kids, but one night something happened that changed everything . We ended up seeing the movie but some of the scenes were nothing alike the book. I mean to be totally honest there wasn’t a lot of errors just missing some important parts I wouldn’t say they added some scenes to it. Naturally they were young men acting like greasers, but they really acted really well as a family, that is what I think made the movie like a true family bond. I think how they acted like very close and like caring, it was really good because in the book and the movie they were all very close and they acted like a real family. This writing is about what the differences are in the movie from the book and what important parts I thought they missed and didn't put in the movie what kind of

One of the hardest things for a director to do is to turn a book into a movie. There is a fine line between keeping the movie just like the book, and by barely crossing that line you can end up making a completely different vision than the book has set out for you. There are also many viewers out there that will completely hate the movie if it is nothing like the book that they read originally. The director has to realize that although there are many different types of audiences to please, that it still has to be a great movie that people cannot stop talking about.

The difference between the developing way of books and movies is magnificently huge because the way of emotion transmitting is different; the movie is based on vision, while the book is based on words.

Dick and Perry were depicted to be sent to Leavenworth Prison, where it was dull and frigid. This could be implied as to the coldness of the executioner’s hearts, and how mericilis Dick and Perry’s activities were. The night of the executioner’s executions wad depicted in April, yet Capote portrays it as being dull, frigid, and cool. This climate would not be typical for Leavenworth, Kansas, in April. This comparison of climate differences between the story and the motion picture are not straightforwardly as opposted to what is in the content of the stories. The climate amid Dick and Perry’s chance in jail is rarely specified in print. With that being said, the conditions are imagined, and does not require the thought of snow to understand the graveness of the situation. In the motion picture, snow has a greater effect on the light of the viewer, because snow requires much colder temperatures. The icy, snowy weather, helps complete the light in which the viewer

McCarty writes, "He wrote all day and the day was clouded before him and a cool wind was coming downcountry." (line 1-2). Here, McCarthy practices imagery to convey John Grady's emotions to his audience. The day being cold and cloudy represents John Grady's depressed state after having to leave the love

“Books are better than movies because you design the set the way you want it to look.” This quote comes from Trent Reznor and some may agree and some may disagree. When reading a written version , the reader can visualize characters in their own way with context clues from the book. In movies, the viewer sees the characters the way the director wants to portray them.

Each novel and movie is different in several ways. They also contain many similarities. They consist of diverse music, opening, and a great mass of others. They also hold several similarities such as narrators, relationships, and more.

Why in the world do they make movies so different from the book! If the idea is to make a movie that shows the book on the “big screen,” why in the world do they change so many things? Of course there are the similarities, as there always is, but the majority is different.

When there is a book, there may be a movie that follows. Some people prefer reading a book over watching a movie, and some prefer just watching a movie. Movies follow the same story line as their book. However, they have similarities and differences.

As Stephen King, an author, once said, “Books and movie are like apples and oranges. They are both fruits, but taste completely different.” Which is true. The movie a Raisin in The Sun is better than the book because the movie gives more details and information rather than the book. By adding more details and information to the movie, it makes it seem more interesting than the book. Even though the author added little details to the movie it feels like there are a lot going on. The book compared to the movie just seems boring. Change is good, sometimes in life you have to try new things to make something better. By changing the movie up a bit, there seems to be more going on, as was mentioned before. Like it was said in the quote, the movie and book looks the same and has the same features, but it is also completely different from one and other. Like it was said in the quote, the movie and book are similar, but are different in many ways. Here are some examples that are listed in the next three paragraphs.

The movies ruin the imagination for when read the book is read. They force people to see what directors think certain scenes are supposed to look like, how they think characters names are pronounced, and how they think a character may look and act. The actors are not always like the characters they are supposed to play. It ruins the book because people already have an idea what the character is like in the movie, but they may be different in the

Partly this would also look at how a film draws from a novel, through its own practices of narrative complexity and mimetic richness. In the twentieth century the film has surfaced as a popular narrative form. In the times, when films have become a major source of entertainment as well as information, the popularity of films is unmatched. This can be seen from the number of films that are made each year, and the way they are loved by the audiences. Undoubtedly, the films have become a very popular medium that narrates stories of human interest in a well packaged