COMPLAINT M, Esq. filed a complaint on behalf of N against Attorney J on October 1, 2014. G alleges that S assisted Me in fraudulent conduct. S has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof.C. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 8.4(c) & (d). FACTS The complainant, N is the husband and legal guardian (since March 3, 2009) of A; A is the sister of M. On June 12, 1989 B, the mother of A and M, retained Attorney J, a family friend, to assist in the execution of a deed. The deed transferred the ownership of Barbara's home at 27 Elm to Al and M. Shortly after on October 16, 1989, another deed for the same property was executed transferring a portion of the property back to Barbara. This document is purported to contain the signatures of B, Al, and M Helena. On January 25, 2006 …show more content…
Despite the fact the deeds are notarized by Si, Ga claims that his wife’s signature is forged as she resides in Brazil and was not present when the documents were signed, additionally A’s has been in a vegetative state for 13 years and may have been mentally incapacitated prior to that. Furthermore, the jurat on the document states that A “personally appeared” and proved her identification via a Massachusetts driver’s license. According to G, A has never had a Massachusetts driver’s license. G claims that he confronted M and she admitted to she signing A’s name to the deeds for 27 Elm …show more content…
Maria Helena continues to claim that Alcide gave her permission to sign the deeds. Simolo is unsure when Alcide was officially diagnosed with Alzheimer’s but informed me that she has been in a vegetative state for the past 13 years, this obviously overlaps with the 2006 deed signing. Barbara currently lives at 27 Elm Street with her granddaughter. This is an additional issue in the civil matter, as her granddaughter is living in the home rent free and this could potentially been seen as a “gift” which would prohibit her from receiving MassHealth. Simolo claims one of the main reasons the matter has not settled is because Garcez is fighting for the payment of his attorney fees, to date the fees are approximately $15,000. Although nothing has been officially filed, Simolo claims to have had many conversations with Maria Helena’s counsel regarding the fees. He doesn’t anticipate that a malpractice suit will be filed against Silva, partly due to the amount of fees that have already been racked
Can plaintiff Ron Arnett state a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) under Pennsylvania law given that Arnett was located twenty feet from the accident that injured Sarah Nolan, saw Ricky Landis running toward the pool and realized immediately after the impact what had happened, but viewed the impact while underwater; and though they share an emotional bond, Arnett and Nolan are not biologically or legally related?
On October 29th, 2015, I made the trip to small claims court at the Superior Court North County Division in Vista, California. The case I observed was a contract dispute between Michael Mendell and Ediga Narashima. The plaintiff (Mendell) was sueing the defendant (Narashima) for $4,000 over a breach of contract. Narashima had given Mendell the opportunity to build theatre system and a bookshelf for his home. They both came to an agreement that the total cost of this procedure would be $4,100. Mr. Mendell is a professor at APT College where he teaches telecommunications. Mendell claims that the full $4,100 was never paid to him. During the whole process of the build there was many setbacks and problems that arose. Mendell claimed that while he was working on this home theatre project, he missed out on work and money he could have obtained from his other job as a professor. That is the reason why he is sueing Narashima as well as the fact that Mendell claims Narashima did not pay him his final installment of $300 for the job. Ediga Narashima claims that the final installment was paid through a friend or third party named Mario Diaz. Mario was a friend of both the plaintiff and defendant. He had referred Mendell to Narashima for the job. Mendell counterclaims that he had never received the final installment from Mario. The big question is to whether Mario had payed the final installment to Mendell as they agreed in
7. The Taylors bought an ocean front lot in Oregon. The next year, Staley bought an ocean front lot south of the Taylors and built a home on it. Over the years, Staley often expressed concern that when the Taylors built their house, they could block her view. They said they would not. When they began planning their home, they asked Staley to submit a letter in support of a setback variance they sought. She said she would as long as her view wasn’t blocked. They again told her it wouldn’t be blocked. When the house was built, it partially blocked her view. She sued for breach of an
Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants was the agent and employee of each of the remaining Defendants and was at all times acting within the purpose and scope of such agency and employment.
1. The Mashpee Wamponoag lost their 1976 lawsuit seeking to reclaim approximately 16,000 acres that had previously belonged to them on Cape Cod. Which of the following was not true regarding the case?
With due consideration of the facts present we can identify that the key legal issue is accession. This gives us the notion that one [thing] which is united with another [thing] becomes an integral part component of that other [thing]. It presupposes that one object can be regarded as the main object . Under the roman derived maxim ‘Accessorium principali sequitur’ . The allocation of ownership of the sandstone structure, (herein referred to as folly) can be established in cases
Moran had been provided with a complete list of her husband’s financial and property interests. Rudder, 217 P.3d at 195; Coward 582 P.2d at 834. The law governing this dispute, ORS 108.725 does not explicitly require a spouse to provide value figures with regards to their financial and property interests. Although, Ms. Moran did not possess the value figures with regards to the Mr. Moran’s financial and property interests she already possessed information required by law. Further, Ms. Moran’s business experience suggests that she could be reasonably expected to discover the value figures of Mr. Moran’s easily if she desired to do
Comes Plaintiff, Constance Wolf F/K/A Constance Wolfgram, by counsel, and for her complaint states as follows:
I would like to inform you that I have received the confirmation from Jeremy Dittmer that they can help us with the sexual harassment and unlawful discrimination in the workplace.
The organisation, Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd, claimed a dairy farm in New South Wales. The Husband, in his ability as executive of the organisation, exchanged title of the land to both himself and his wife as joint occupants in like manner. The spouse later moved his enthusiasm for the property to his wife for $1. An Application was brought by the organisation against the spouse and wife in the New South Wales Supreme Court looking for that the property be exchanged back to the organisation because of fraudulent activities of the spouse. The trial judge requested that the spouse pay remuneration to the organisation, however dismissed the procedures against the wife as she herself was not a knowing party to the fraud.
Petitioner, Shimles Assefa applied for Petition for letter of administration of the Estate of Yeshimebet Teshome , on September 29, 2016 the court reached to the decision. However, I Shimles Assefa , appealed the decree for letter of administration stated that the estimated gross amount value of my late spouse Yeshimebet Teshome personal property is less than $89,000 and I asked the court to wave the decision or to reduce the amount decided by the court . However, I have not been heard from the court since. I ask your esteemed office to understand
A courtesy 90 day supply of refill of Lotrel and Labetalol was ordered. Please complete fasting lab for a full renewal on medications. Also, please do not forget to drop you blood pressure log as requested by Dr. Wells at you last appointment.
The focus here is on good quality, good tasting food that will appeal to her and the children. Segment number three is women with teenage children, ages 12 – 17. Our focus on this segment is quick, easy dinners that teenagers will love and work with their hectic schedule. Our last segment would be empty nesters. This segment wants great quality and wonderful recipes that can be “quick and easy” or “traditional” depending on the amount of time available.
McClain, P. J. A., Sheehan, B. F., & Butler, L. L. (1998). Substantive rights retained by