Logical Structure or Theoretical Framework
Problems do not exist in nature but in the minds of people. This can be seen from an examination of the definition of problem: problems stem from the juxtaposition of factors which results in a perplexing or enigmatic state of mind (a cognitive problem), an undesirable consequence (a psychological or value problem), or a conflict which obscures the appropriate course of action (a practical problem). Cognitions, values and practices are attributes of persons, not the objective world (whatever that is). Problems cannot be articulated except within a conceptual system. No inquirer can investigate a problem from all perspectives simultaneously. And that is what a logical structure or
…show more content…
It makes it possible to generate a relatively complex set of objectives and questions; it provides a basis for including and excluding literature and research that is actually related to the inquiry by identifying the variables of greatest interest and concern; and it provides focus to the inquirer's procedural planning and choices from initial design selection, through instrument development or adoption, to the organization, analysis and interpretation of data, e.g., research design, statistical tests, making sense of empirical findings.
4. Perhaps most important is the impact of the explicit theoretical structure on subsequent inquiry in the same area. The investigation no longer hangs loose but becomes part of a line or tradition of inquiry which other researchers can check, replicate or build upon. Knowledge growth in a field becomes an additive phenomenon of increasingly useful structures or concepts with which inquirers can work.
5. Without a clear explication of the problem and a workable perspective with which to view it, it is likely that the research project will be flawed by uncontrolled extraneous variables, overlooked variables, faulty instruments, haphazard procedures and the like. "You can't get there from here" without taking this step. A failure in this regard is why so many graduate students end up with a procedural plan that runs them in circles. Defining a Logical Structure or Theoretical Framework A logical structure or
The next reason is that “a theory can make people think in broader terms than the immediate relationships being investigated”. If there is a theory people will have more to look at than just their immediate assumption. Theories can make people look deeper into a problem (Gould & Lewis 29).
Theory may raise the ability of individuals and recognize the influences of dispositional, interpersonal, situational, and philosophical aspects that enable one to do so.
issues qualify as common basic problems worldwide, with consequences for the functioning of societies, of
States problem(s) in multiple sentences. Identifies symptoms, critical factors and current state in Background discussion.
According to our book Environmental Science for a Changing World, written by W.H. Freeman the environmental problems can be tremendously complex, and they are inclined to have numerous causes and each of them are challenging to approach. Therefore, when one party tries to give a response to an environmental problem, this will generate a different reaction to the other party, and our book called this as a “wicked problems”. Consequently, a wicked problem is a problem that is impossible to solve because of opposing ideas, and points of view of a determinate problem that are often hard to recognize. Moreover, our book stated that the biologist Jared Diamond identifies five factors that determine whether a society will succeed or fail these factors
This is the step where you ask important and focused question in order to design your study. The questions are generally open ended and inquisitive questions. The questions often start with, who, what, when, where, why and how. The purpose is “to make important procedure questions and to decide what research methods will best help you achieve these design objectives” (Chenail, 2011).
The first step and rule of conducting research is that those who feel any sort of difficulty, they need to ask in order to sort out the difficulties they face in the process of conducting research. For example, if the researchers are conducting research on the usefulness of the difficulties, they also see the positive and negative aspects of the things.
The sources of information that you will use to conduct your research, including in the case of
According to www.merriam-webster.com the term “crime” is defined as: “an illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government”. Some individuals in our society commit some type of crime every day, but why? In this assignment I will try to compile an overall theory as to why individuals commit crimes. While doing my research I came across 10 reasons/factors that can possibly explain why individuals commit crimes. These reasons include: The Prison System, drugs, depression and other social and mental disorders, family conditions, regionalism, T.V. violence, racism, politics, poverty, and overpopulation.
Many problems currently trouble humanity, and everybody will argue that the problems they are currently facing
What is the design and how does the design related to the goals of the study?
A research is valid to the world when a number of key concepts are used in the research design. The document must be organized and planned according to the criteria used in the field. Some important concepts to know include: validity, variable, operationalization, sample, measurement, measurement error, causation, plausible rival explanations, hypothesis, reliability, and unit of analysis. The researcher must learn how to apply each key concept in an effort to make the research study valuable. These concepts will be reviewed individually to be able to understand how to apply them when writing a research paper.
In recent times, there have been three individuals who have provided their interpretations on that structures of science. Thomas Kuhn developed the idea of paradigms, which are nested concepts for looking at the world, and later would propose the idea paradigm shifts for what he called the Kuhn Cycle. Following Kuhn's work, Imre Lakatos and Larry Laudan created their own analysis on scientific structures using Kuhn's work as a base for their own. Lakatos and Laudan both attempted to rationalize and improve on Kuhn's work. In this essay, I will attempt to analyze the differences in Kuhn's work as compared to Lakatos and Laudan and explain which account of scientific structures is the most persuasive to believe in.
structure for the practitioner to follow in what might otherwise seem to be a chaotic series of events.
Exposure to such theories fosters a greater appreciation for the philosophical subjects. I will attempt to give a brief but accurate idea of several of the theories I discovered during my