preview

Kiowa's Death In 'In The Field'

Decent Essays

Felicity Biddlecome p.4 2/24/16 Seminar Question: How does Kiowa’s death change some of the characters in the three chapters “Speaking of Courage”, “Notes”, and “In The Field”? Hypothesis: “Speaking of Courage” gives Bowkers view of Kiowa’s death, “Notes” gives O’brien’s view, and “In The Field” offers the perspective of Kiowa’s death from Azar, Bowker, Cross, and an un-named soldier. Kiowa’s death amounts to be a huge climax in the novel, Kiowa’s gentle, peaceful manner serves as a foil for many characters and his death affects the men immensely. Norman Bowker feels he had betrayed his friend, Bowker thinks he was as brave as he could have been, but even that much bravery wasn’t enough to save his friend. “...You weren't a coward either” …show more content…

Bowker is unable to erase the memory and asks O’brien to write his story. “Notes” tells O’brien’s view on Bowker enhanced by the fact that Norman Bowker ended up killing himself ten years after the war. By working on his story and perfecting it in order to make it carry his feelings about Vietnam and Bowker and Kiowa, O’Brien makes peace with his memories of them. He writes in order to remember in a way that is not painful. Therefore, he originally leaves Kiowa’s death out of “Speaking of Courage,” he ends up putting it back in because he realizes it is an essential part of understanding Bowker’s despair of Kiowa’s death and realizes that it was a hard subject for him as well afterall. “Norman is back in the story, where he belongs...the central incident-our long night in the shit field along the Song Tra Bong-has been restored to the piece.It was hard stuff to write...In the interests of truth, however, I want to make it clear that Norman Bowker was in no way responsible for what happened to Kiowa.”(154) We then go into the third chapter of Kiowa’s death, “In the Field”. “In the Field” addresses how an experience with

Get Access