Huachuca Corporation Case Study

MTC initially needed to obtain substantial investment capital due to two main factors: a research-heavy industry, and the need to create most of the markets for its products. Although the founders' goal was to become a major manufacturing company, they did estimate that the company would need $50 million in capital before it would become self-sufficient. Their initial financing model was to first recruit a superior technical team, use that to attract additional equity investment and development funding from interested corporations, and then develop manufacturing capabilities. Commercial sales began 2.5 years after inception, and MTC is nearing the break-even point in 1990.

The Petitioners, officials of the State of North Carolina, are askeding for the decision of that case to be overruled. They argued that “if inmate communications on legal problems are not restricted, there is no further obligation to expend state funds to implement affirmatively the right of access.” The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

This appeal involves a dispute regarding the interpretation of overtime pay provisions outlined in the Howard County General Pay Plan (“HCGPP”). Appellant, Lynda Neser (“Neser”) contends that she was deprived of compensation to which she was entitled under certain provisions of the HCGPP. Neser filed a grievance with the Howard County Personnel Office. A personnel officer denied Neser’s grievance. Neser then appealed the personnel officer’s decision to the appellees, the Howard County Personnel Board (“the Board”). The Board adopted the findings of the personnel officer and affirmed the denial of Neser’s grievance. Neser then filed a petition for judicial review in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The circuit court affirmed the

In your grievance filed at Buckley Unit, you claim you requested an Inmate Wells 187589 be added to your Do Not House With list and COIII Jones refused your request. Your resolution is to have your disciplinary ticket removed from your record and transfer you to Rast Unit.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The Arizona Department of Corrections has entered into a contract with Century Link to provide telephone service for inmates and their families. The Century Link Company is complying with the terms of their contractual obligation with ADC. ADC inmates are not authorized to have internet access. Therefore, your proposed resolution is denied.

I have reviewed your appeal dated September 1, 2015. In your complaint, you contend the percent required to serve should be 50% instead of 80% regarding St. Louis County Cause 11SL-CR08266 (Sequence 12) and St. Charles County Cause 1111-CR06523-01(Sequence 13). You contend the 2009 Long Term Treatment incarceration under Cycle 20071105 should not count as a commitment; however, because this is your second Long Term Treatment incarceration it does count as a prior commitment. You were received in the Missouri Department of Corrections on October 27, 1997, to serve your first Long Term Treatment commitment regarding St. Louis County Cause 97CR-000779A (Sequence 11) and 96CR-06039 (Sequence 12). Had you successfully completed the program and released

In your grievance filed at Lumley Unit, you claim that you previously refused to participate in the GED program because you had already obtained your high school diploma. You further assert that your refusal subjected you to loss of Phase and pay rate. Your resolution is for DO 903 to be revised and allow inmates to receive a pay increase after a previous program refusal.

In your grievance filed at Central Unit, you claim you were told by Ms. Newman that you would be moved to CB1 if you complied with the program at Kasson Unit and achieved step two. You are requesting to be moved to CB1 immediately.

I reviewed our appeals last night. It will take me until the end of the week to clear out the following appeals below.

In your grievance filed at Huachuca Unit, you claim you are being denied indigent supplies. Your resolution is to receive the requested indigent supplies.

In your grievance filed at Huachuca Unit, you claim the current procedure for receiving store is not effective. You further assert that you are consistently missing items and have to wait to be reimbursed. Your resolution is to for ADC to change vendors.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The food menu is reviewed quarterly. The inspection is conducted by the Health Unit and the Department's Dietician.

Conbraco Industries, Inc. (“Conbraco”) manufactures plumbing and heating products, water gauges, pop safety and relief valves, marine fittings and backflow prevention devices. Those lines join the company's ball valves, actuators and mixing valves as part of the complete Apollo Valves family of products.

In your grievance filed at SMUI, you claim your behavior has improved and you should be transferred to a lower custody yard. You further assert that you should be returned to the Illinois Department of Corrections to complete your sentence. Your resolution is to be transferred.

Courts will allow some restrictions on a prisoner’s access to legal resources in order to accommodate legitimate administrative concerns, such as maintaining security and internal order, preventing the introduction of contraband, preventing the domination of the library by regular users, and observing budgetary constraints. In the absence of a legitimate administrative concern, however, prisoners may not be hindered from gaining access to the judicial process. Inmates who have been denied access to legal materials have not necessarily suffered a constitutional deprivation when they are confined for only a short period of time.