Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Non-operating Value

First, the projected cash flows range from $21.2 million in 2007 to $29.5 million in 2011 as shown in the data exhibit ‘DCF model.’ To generate these numbers Liedtke’s base case performance projections are used for the projected 2007 – 2011 net revenue numbers and the estimated depreciation and then his projections for Balance sheet accounts were used to determine the current net working capital and capital expenditure as in the exhibit ‘Financial statements.’ These projections were based by Liedtke under the following assumptions, women’s casual footwear would be wound down within one year and the historical corporate overhead-revenue ratio would conform to historical averages. These annual cash flows give us a PV (Cash flows) of $96.15 million over the next 5 years.

All of the cash flows are discounted back to the year of 2002 in the calculation of NPV value. With the annual cost savings of $80 from 2003 to 2007 and the integration cost of total $130, Timken’s new NPV is calculated to be -$970.42.

* From the statement of AirThread case, we know that American Cable Communication want to raise capital by Leveraged Buyout (LBO) approach. This means ACC will finance money though equity and debt to buy AirThread and pay the debt by the cash flows or assets of AirThread.

2. Do you favor the proposed acquisition of UCP? What are the primary sources of value in such a transaction? Is the proposed price reasonable?

Futronics Inc. is a $2 billion firm that sells communications services. Founded in 1937, Futronics Inc. has provided consumer products, as well as government systems and services, for well over half a century. Due to a sharp increase in competition, flattened sales, and external economic conditions, Futronics Inc. is implementing a corporate overhead reduction program. The proposal is to replace the company’s central office stores with outside vendors. The investment will cost $1,000,000 and yield incremental cash flows of $450,000 in year one (1), $350,000 in year two (2), $300,000 in year three (3), and $250,000 in year four (4). There is no salvage value of the asset, and the firm has a cost of capital of 8%. Using capital budget methods, Net Profit Value, Internal Rate of Return and Payback method, the capital investment can be appraised. Futronics Inc.

Briefly summarize the key facts you noted in your study of the five components of internal control and the rationale for the conclusions you made in the audit program concerning whether each component was adequately designed and implemented.

15. What is the Present Value (NPV) to Sterling of the base investment using FCF for 2013-2033?

g. On December 31, 2012, the company completed the work on a contract for an out-of-province company for $7,900 payable by the customer within 30 days. No cash has been collected and no journal entry has been made for this transaction.

Commercial’s NPV is $.1516 million (see Table 3). This was determined by using the present values of the four year lease agreement between Prudent and Commercial. We concluded that Commercial’s discount rate will be 10% because of their opportunity cost. Commercial needs to have a residual value on the DAS of 6.8 million or greater, which will give them a positive net present value. Therefore, if their net present value shows negative, they would not want to lease to us. Assuming Commercial receives the same 5 year MACRS rate on the equipment purchase, then the system should be worth 7.01 million (book value) at the end of year 4 (see Table 4). This allows Commercial to have a positive NPV of $.1516 million (see Table 4). Therefore, they would be willing to lease the DAS to us.

Student Cases with Solutions to accompany Accounting & Auditing Research: Tools & Strategies (7th edition)

According to my analysis of the Accessline’s proposed term sheet, I do not believe that Apex would serve its own interests, or those of its investing partners, by investing in Accessline according to the terms proposed. By investing at the proposed valuation, according to the proposed control and incentive structure, Apex would be shouldering a disproportionate share of the risk should Accessline fail to meet its performance targets, or require fresh inflows of capital from future investment rounds. Nor can Accessline take the sort of steps necessary to protect its investment in the case of management failure.

We can use a combination of APV and WACC approach to value AirThread Connections – using APV for 2008-2012, and using WACC to estimate the terminal value.

Our case study titled, The AT&T and McCaw merger negotiation, provides us with an opportunity to negotiate the terms of the merger between McCaw cellular and AT&T. McCaw was the largest competitor in the rapidly growing cellular telephone communications industry. AT&T was the dominant competitor in long-distance telephone communications in the United States, and one of the largest corporations. Prior to the negotiations, it had no position in cellular communications.

The upgrade of the Rotterdam plant involves implementing the Japanese technology and requires a capital expenditure of £8.0 million with £3.5 million spent today, £2.0 million on year one, £1.0 million on year two and £1.0 million on year three. This will also increase polypropylene output by 7% from current levels at a rate of 2.0% per year. In addition, gross margin will improve by 0.8% per year from 11.5% to 16.0%. After auditing the financial models, it is concluded that the static net present value of the upgrade is -£6.35 million using a discount rate of 10% and an expected inflation rate of 3% annually. The Rotterdam upgrade contains an option to switch to the speculated German technology being available in five years. The current value of the option is zero as it is deeply out-of-the-money. The total net present value of the upgrade is -£6.35 million. The incremental earnings per share of the upgrade is £ 0.0013, the payback period is 14.13 years, and the internal rate of return is 18.7%.

Multiples approach is applied in the with-synergies valuation as well. Incorporating the effects of 80million cost savings for the merged firm (to be achieved by end of 2007 and assumed to incur in perpetuity then on) and 130 million integration costs (half of this accounted in each of first 2 years) in the estimated EBITA for Torrington. The with-synergies EBITDA is estimated to be $156.2 and then multiply average bearing industry EV/ EBITDA (7), enterprise value of $1103.16 million is evaluated, exceeding the value as a stand-alone entity by approximately $360 million. Sheet3: Multiples valuation method