Why Is Chain Of Command Important

According to Army Regulation six hundred dash twenty, chapter two, paragraph two dash one, subsection (a): “the chain of command assists commanders at all levels to achieve their primary function of accomplishing the unit’s assigned mission while caring for personnel and property in their charge.” What that means is that the chain of command facilitates communication from the highest commander to the lowest private as fast and accurate as necessary in order to get the mission accomplished and the soldiers and equipment taken care of. The chain of command is basically like a ladder, where you go as high or low as you need to, to take care of the issue. It’s designed so that the issues can be addressed and resolved at the lowest level. But,

With out the chain of command there would be no real order in how we as a whole work. The purpose of the chain of command is to tell people what they can and cannot do. So why we as a grown adults follow the chain of command, it is simple we choose to because of the fact that we raised are right hand and said yes I will. No matter how much we disagree with someone or something we should do it and then ask questions later that is the purpose of the chain without it what would we be. Consequences for disobeying the chain of command inside of the US Army are endless from as small as corrective training, verbal counseling, to being negatively counseled or given an Article 15.

Why it is important to follow proper instruction procedures in the military is for many reasons. As a soldier it is our responsibility to not only follow instruction/orders, but to execute the command. Not following orders can result into consequences not only for the soldier whom committed not following instructions, but also it can put others at risk too. Like your N.C.O. in charge of you, to your Team Leader, to your Section Sergeant, to your Platoon Sergeant, to your 1st Sergeant, to your Company Commander, to your Brigade Commander, and so on. Not only can your N.C.O. in charge of you, your Team Leader, your Section Sergeant, your Platoon Sergeant, your 1st Sergeant, your Company Commander,

Information passes up the chain of command and orders and commands are passed down the chain of command ("Chain," 2003). As the Proverb says a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. If the wrong or ill-informed information is sent up the command chain then the decision at the top will be ill advised and the commands down the chain potentially disastrous.

1st platoon did the exact opposite, with leaders publicly ridiculing and berating their subordinates in front of other soldiers. The diminishing unit cohesion led to a lack of respect between subordinates and superiors. Due to the overwhelming amount of disrespect within the unit, no clear and concise standards were ever set in regards to professionalism between subordinates and superiors. The subordinates were blatantly disrespectful, mouthed off, undisciplined, and did not swiftly follow lawful commands set before them. The leaders lacked communication, direction and were unable to set any boundaries between their subordinates. This led to inappropriate friendships, which in turn led to many undesirable behaviors being ignored.

Soldiers feel unit leaders would make bad decisions in combat due to the micromanagement in the company and the Commander does not listen to recommendation from unit leaders.

It is the purpose of this paper to discuss toxic leadership and the effects it can have on a new second lieutenant. The Army needs to be concerned with toxic leadership, because of the seriousness of consequences that are caused by leadership failure, which in the worst case scenarios can lead to death or mutiny. The proposed solutions to toxic leadership in this paper will provide future officers and newly commissioned second lieutenants possible ways to combat toxic leadership and ways to prevent it. Firstly, this paper will address what is a toxic leader, and how to identify one. Secondly, this paper will explain how a toxic leader affects your platoon. Next, this paper will explain why toxic leadership is tolerated with the Army. Lastly, this paper will provide solutions on how to deal with toxic leadership, and what measures can be implemented to mitigate the risks of it happening.

Thorough the course of Naval history from its violent but humble beginnings in the revolutionary war era, to the now “modern age” Navy we know today, three major core values have developed and made their way as a staple in the teachings of each and every sailor: Honor, Courage, and Commitment. These Core Values, instilled from the beginning of our career in boot camp, are the three guiding qualities that every sailor strives to impersonate in their everyday life, and it is these principles that we rely on to lead the way. In this paper we will take a look into the importance of following orders, the necessity of personal

chain of command in distributing jobs and details, skipping non commissioned officers and making it hard for the non commissioned officer to know where their soldiers are at and to know what they are doing. These certain actions leave a non commissioned officer without respect for their rank, making their soldiers not to use the proper chain of command. Some commanders go against their ethics while they are performing their duties and influences younger officers to do the same thing. There is no other army in the world that uses their non commissioned officers like they are used in the United States army, putting more responsibilities on the non commissioned officers than any other officer. Establishing non commissioned officers in charge

When a person goes beyond their first line supervisor they rob that person of ever having a chance at solving the problem at their level. Supervisors a higher levels have their own task they have to tend to usually dealing with strategic matters and planning operations. Most are not prepared to deal with simple issues that could've been handled by the soldiers supervisor. It also may take the time away from more important issues within that echelon. Reporting problems to the supervisor at the lowest level is more effective for the organization. This structure is usually used to establish control in larger organizations. If everyone in the ranks were able to report to whom ever they wanted. It would be chaotic. Nothing would get done. This also leaves too for subordinates complain about senseless inquiries. Using the proper chain is just for the organization but for the individual as well. When the proper Chanel's are used. This is a good mechanism for covering your own tracks. This leaves sense of responsibility on the supervisor to handle the issue. For in the events you do have to speak with the next higher. You will me covered. It's common Curtsy of

I agree with you there needs to be order or there is chaos so with organizational structure gives all parties the information or ways to get information to accomplish the goal. When I was in the U. S. Navy there was structure with a chain of command and if you did not follow it you had to answer to your commander. You also knew your place in the chain of command and be prepared to answer any and all questions that were addressed to you while having respect for the party that was addressing you. Just think of it this way what if we were aboard ship and decided to go back to Hawaii without the superior officer’s orders then we would probably all end up in the brig.

The military can only function if orders, when given, are obeyed. And, as much as we would like to trust in the honesty and integrity of the human spirit, of the men and women who made that oath, put their lives on the line for their country, and fight to keep our brothers and sisters free, the sad truth is that there are many out there that, if not given a clear set of rules, a clear set of punishments for transgressions, will not follow the rules, will not care about the punishments, will not be productive, efficient members of the military machine.

Soldiers who fail to obey the lawful orders of their superiors risk serious consequences. Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice makes it a crime for a soldier to WILLFULLY disobey a superior commissioned officer.

I am writing this essay on the importance of following order because I recently disobeyed a few General orders. Our commanders put out orders and make them very clear to us for multiple reasons. One of the main reasons is that these orders are there to protect us as Soldiers and not only our images but the images of our fellow Soldiers and the Army itself. The Army and our commanding officers have our best interests at hand and they put in place the orders they do for that particular reason. As junior enlisted Soldiers we follow orders on a daily basis from our NCO’s in command of us so in this sense following orders is a part of our daily lives and jobs.

Those are just the simple orders you are made to obey in the military. Greater orders mean bigger consequences. Military members who fail to obey the lawful orders of their superiors risk serious consequences.