preview

F1 Flies Research Paper

Better Essays

RESULTS
Table 1: Phenotypes of F1 flies produced by crossing wild-type females and no-winged males. Females Males Total
Wild-Type 47 53 100
No -winged Mutant 0 0 0

Table 1 shows the phenotypes of the F1 flies produced by crossing P1 wild-type females and P1 no-winged mutant males. The results of that cross was that there were forty seven wild-type females and fifty three wild-type males. Therefore there was a total of one hundred wild-type flies that were produced. The observed phenotypic ratio of wild-type flies and no-winged mutant flies was 1:0 (wild-type: no-winged). The predicted phenotypic ratio if the no-winged mutation is autosomal recessive would be 1:0 (winged: no-winged).
Table 2: Phenotypes of F1 flies produced by crossing wild-type males and no-winged females. Females Males Total
Wild-Type 59 41 100
No-winged Mutant 0 0 0

Table 2 shows the phenotypes of the F1 flies produced by crossing P1 wild-type males and P1 no-winged females. The results of that cross was that there was fifty nine wild-type females and forty one males. Therefore there was a total of one hundred wild-type flies produced from crossing P1 true breeding wild-type males and P1 true breeding virgin …show more content…

The results of this cross was that there were thirty eight wild-type females and thirty five wild-type males. Therefore there were seventy three wild-type flies. There were sixteen no-winged mutant males and eleven no-winged mutant females. Therefore there was a total of twenty seven no-winged flies produced in this cross. The observed phenotypic ratio of wild-type flies and no-winged mutant flies was 2.7:1 (winged: no-winged).The predicted phenotypic ratio if the no-winged mutation was autosomal recessive would be 3:1 (winged: no-winged). The χ2 value obtained for this cross was 0.213. The p value that was obtained for this cross was

Get Access