preview

Arguments Against The Limitation Of Speed

Decent Essays

This essay is an argument against the limitation of speed. I feel as if there should be no speed limit if these three reasons occur. Such as there is no traffic ahead or behind you, if there is a really bad emergency, And if you are on the interstate in the far left lane. Those are the main three reasons why I feel there should be restricted speed limitations on some occasions. If there is no traffic behind you or ahead of you then why should you limit your speed? For example if it’s early in the morning and there is no traffic ahead, behind, or to the sides then why are you forced to go 35mph. When you receive your license that’s basically saying the state can trust u as a driver. That you are a safe driver so under that circumstance you should be able to drive at a comfortable speed of your choice. As long as there are no drivers around you and you’re not a reckless driver. Now if your child is in a critical condition or is having an allergic reaction to something he or she shouldn’t have ate and you are rushing to the emergency room but have to go 25mph. Would you respect or disobey that law? Just like an ambulance goes through traffic when it’s an emergency I think we should be able too. For the simple fact that I feel everything and everybody should be equal. Including law enforcement and any other federal branch …show more content…

Keep in mind that the interstate speed limits average at least 60mph and the basic cars from the year 2000 – 2015 can go up to 110 mph why is there a need for a speed limit. If the driver in front of you hits the brake then you can switch lanes and speed back up, or slow down behind that vehicle. Interstates have a lot of crashes due to sleeping at the wheel, not paying attention, and drunk driving. None usually have to do with exceeding speed limits and if they do it is because the driver isn’t comfortable with the speed he is driving

Get Access