preview

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay

Good Essays

On the 1st of January 1863, Abraham Lincoln issued the emancipation Proclamation. It declared that in certain named rebellious areas and states slaves were “forever free” The purpose of the proclamation was on its face military necessity. It authorised the freed slaves to enlist in the military in attempt to bolster the unions army and navy. It was a significant political and military turning point in the civil war, and ultimately the abolition movement. In source A, Douglas T Miller describes the Emancipation Proclamation as ineffective in the liberation of slaves within America, stating “it actually free few people”. He concedes however that it changed the purpose and perception of the war, to being the end of slavery. Whilst Millers argument …show more content…

Ultimately, source A is correct in saying that Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation actually freed few people in the short term, however its diplomatic and foreign impact, its military effect and its implication for abolitionist was profound. In the long term, the Emancipation Proclamation was successful, in its attempts for the liberation of slaves. Ultimately, although Millers did elude to the idea of a “war to end slavery” , source A, failed to fully demonstrate the profound effect, the Emancipation Proclamation had on the diplomatic stage, and consequently the Union Victory. Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, acted as a major turning point both militarily and diplomatically during the American Civil war. In direct consequence of the Proclamation there was a diplomatic boost towards the Union. Prior to 1863, throughout the north and world-wide, …show more content…

The Emancipation proclamation acted as the turning point for the civil rights, anti-slavery movement within America, by liberating any slave within the confederate or rebelling states and paving the way for future civil-right policies. The Emancipation proclamation, declared under American law that slaves, in rebelling states, were freemen. As seen in source A, although the slaves were liberated, the effect of this was limited by the lack of enforcement in this policy, with slaves unable to immediately liberate themselves. As confederate states were in rebellion, it proved unlikely for them to follow the rules of the federal government, rather it required union forces for liberation. It’s because of this that some historians argue against the effect of the emancipation proclamation. This meant for the elongated and inefficient process of emancipation. Nonetheless, when it took effect it, it legally freed approximately 3.1 million southern slaves , henceforth proving its effect. Secondly the Emancipation acted as an irreversible step in the emancipation process and the liberation of all slavery. It paved the way for future, progressive, policy to be established in order to further the civil rights movement . The effect of the Proclamation was fully solidified through

Get Access