Dr. Jones Case Summary

We are going to explore the world of ethical issues in psychology. As in any medical or mental health fields there are rules we all must follow as professionals. In this essay today we will be exploring a case study where we have a young lady who has been stricken by a mental disability. We will be looking at the facts in which her disability was handled by a professional in the field of psychology. We also will be discussing the rights and wrongs that are presented in her case study. We will also be discussing the APA ethical codes and gain a clearer understanding of where some things went wrong and why shall we begin.

Adam got an invitation from his friend to go to a baseball game. Adam is not familiar with the game of baseball and has no knowledge of the game or know what happens at baseball games. Because he immigrated to the United States. His friend purchased some seats just a few rows up from the field, along the first base line. Majority of baseball stadiums have nets hung behind home plate and not along the baselines. While enjoying the entertainment of the game.

There are specific ethical considerations that need to be addressed when investigating Homicide and rape. A few of these ethical considerations are shared between the two such as the investigators mind state. This plays an important role in the preparations required for a successful prosecution. The investigator must be open-minded to any and all possibilities and be un-bias. The investigator must also know how to conduct all the elements of an investigation in the proper manner from a professional and legal aspect.

In a New York City school, there is a young, attractive teacher, who also doubles as the school’s football coach. This high school has the reputation for having one of the best football teams. The teacher/coach, Mr. Nelson, s close with several of the football players on his team. They often seek out his advice for various problems. There is a select “inner circle” who gets invited to Mr. Nelson’s house to watch games socialize. There have been rumors circulating that there is partying and drinking while the students are present. With the previous statement in consideration, these boys are in high school and are not of a legal drinking age. There is another planned and Mr. Nelson’s old football pals are invited, along with the current best

In Taney’s opinion on the Scott vs. Sanford case, he reasons why the court’s decision to refuse Dred Scott’s citizenship was the right one. Taney pulls from multiple sources, such as the declaration of independence, the constitution, and congress to void Dred Scott’s case. With a stoic tone, Taney meticulously tears Scott’s claim to shreds. Taney does not believe that Dred Scott is entitled to citizenship. In his written opinion, he conveys this in the most professional way possible.

On March 1, 2016 at approximately 09:30 AM, Jacklyn Thomas was at the Muskogee County District Court House in reference to a review hearing. Investigator Joe Poffel knew Ms. Thomas had two felony warrants out for her arrest through Muskogee County. Ms. Thomas was placed into custody after her court hearing without further incident, and was transported to the Muskogee Police Department to subsequently be interview on an additional case involving Ms. Thomas' children. After the interview, Ms. Thomas was taken to the Muskogee County Jail.

To discuss whether or not the two expert witnesses in the case of Commonwealth of Virginia versus Allen (Va. 2005) acted or behaved unethically, it is important to look at the guidelines and principles of their expertise to determine such. It is essential to revisit or review the APA Code of Ethics and the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (Professionals). From these two guidelines or documents, one can determine the proper or appropriate credentials, assessments, scope, relationships, as well as the “don’ts” covered in this discipline or respect. The documents will reveal or allow an evaluation of each expert witness’s performance or service to the client to be either ethical or unethical.

In this scenario, as a psychologist I face several ethical issues. According to the American Psychological Association, Ethical Principles of Psychologist and Code of Conduct there are at least six standards I have to

Mr. Davy Jones is a 60-year-old man that presents incontinence, nocturia, difficulty urinating, and a weak stream when urinating. The patient visited the clinic on 03/01/2017 after experiencing these issues for approximately two months. He is experiencing fatigue with not being able to achieve adequate sleep during the night due to nocturia. He is complaining of bladder always feeling full after voiding. Patient has had multiple UTI’s that was treated with antibiotics and was successful with medicinal treatment.

According to Chrisler and McCreary (2010), the American Psychological Association Code of Ethics and the Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists warn against dual roles of mental health professionals (p.590) because of the possibility of swaying from objectivity (Greenberg & Shuman, 2007, p.129). This provision perceives that forensic practice involves a relationship with patients that is different from a therapeutic practice. As Greenberg and Shuman (1997) state, these dual roles are incompatible. Chrisler and McCreary

The Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, published by the American Psychological Association are the standard guidelines for all Psychologists. Forensic Psychologists are also informed by Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologist. Psychologists practicing forensic psychology can use these two documents to help clarify ethical questions. This paper will focus on role conflicts specifically in the area of Sex Offender Management and the ethical conflicts that may arise as a result and how to best handle this situation when faced with it. When an individual chooses to practice psychology within the legal system, they must be aware that this can at any point in their career lead to ethical conflicts. Just the possibility

In the mental health profession of counseling, therapy, psychology, psychiatric and social services ethical dilemmas are faced primarily on a daily basis. Being that mental health professionals are working with clients who are often fragile and vulnerable, they must develop an intense awareness of ethical issues. On the other hand, mental health professionals would never intentionally harm their clients, students or colleagues and others whom they work with. Unfortunately, good intentions are not enough to ensure that wrong doings will not occur and mental health professionals have no choice but to make ethically determined decisions. Depending upon the experience and expertise of the professional determines the outcome of the ethical

In this short essay, the author will write an ethics paper analyzing the movie "Analyze This" from an ethical perspective in a social science setting. It will be answered from the perspective of a psychological and counseling professional who has to balance off the real and potential conflicts at individual, professional and societal levels as portrayed in the film. As such, we will identify specific laws and ethics codes that have been violated. The author will discuss the case as if they are consulting with or supervising Ben Sobel in the film who they believe is behaving unethically or unlawfully. They will state clearly what he is doing unethically or unlawfully with a supportive historical background. They will then provide the possible steps for managing and correcting the situation. The entire film is a therapist's behavior that revolvess around these issues; Confidentiality, Privileged Communication, Privacy, Informed consent, and Receiving gifts, and a Legal perspective upon the issues.

I feel that Dr. P has a case in this situation. I feel he has the ability to sue for compensatory damages. I would argue that Dr. P is a public figure. As you said he is the foremost academic on exposure to violence and the human psyche. Since he is a public figure and his work is important to public interest. Because of this we have to prove malice. In this case we also have to determine how defamation of DR. P is present. We have to answer how his reputation is being harmed, how his standing in the community is being harmed.

Because of the doctors’ profession, a psychiatrist must abide by the ethic of nonmaleficence when it comes to their patients. This article is true, “When conflicts occur among psychologists’ obligations or concerns, they attempt to resolve these conflicts in a responsible fashion that avoids or minimizes harm” (Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, n.d.). For this profession, this is very important because their judgment can have a serious effect on a person mind. If there were no ethics to guide them not to do no harm, psychology could become an unethical profession within the health care system. This ethic could also be the reason for the raise of concern that Dr. McHale has for the detainee.