Not only is the death penalty unfair in terms of race, background, or mental state, but it also unfair in terms of the cost it brings to the nation. The death penalty is really expensive. It is even more expensive than life without parole since the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases. This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit (however, even with these protections, the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated). “If the death penalty was replaced with a sentence of Life Without the Possibility of Parole, which costs millions less and also ensures that the public is protected while eliminating the risk …show more content…
The fact that the punishment is so cruel really makes the death penalty worthy of fear, a human’s most darkest emotion. The best method to prevent a person from doing crime is to show him the fear of consequences of his actions. “Like the fear of going into the “Hell” after death stops one from doing any immoral act, same way, fear of capital punishment that is, fear of losing life is the greatest fear for any human” (Singh). The fact that the death penalty still exists today really gives people fear of such a system. Even life imprisonment is less feared because in that case, at least the life is saved. But in the case of capital punishment, snatching away of the human life is the most terrifying consequence for any human being. Therefore this aspect of the death really allows people to think about their actions before committing to them. It gives people another perspective of their actions since they know that their own life may be in risk as well. Another positive aspect of the system can be seen from the fact that it guarantees that the criminal will not commit such a crime again. A criminal is like a rotten apple among the good ones, he is like a virus to the society, which can even infect others of the same disease. Like a doctor excises any body part to save life of a patient likewise, a criminal is cut out permanently from the …show more content…
It is wrong in every way; it is unfair in every way. The death penalty punishes minorities, it punishes the poor. Once a minority is convicted, their case has practically already been settled since people of poor backgrounds do not get the competent lawyer they need to even fight against their case. Instead of following such an unjust system, let us follow a system in which we do not have to kill people for what they did wrong. There are so much better alternatives in punishing criminals. For example, in every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The sentence is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for good. Unlike the death penalty, a sentence of Life Without Parole also allows mistakes to be corrected, since you do not have time to reflect on your act once you die. It is much more effective and ethical since we do not have to taint blood on those who execute others with the people they are forced to
Death penalty is a constant source of controversy and divided opinion depending on who you ask. The punishment of death is given to criminals who commit severe crimes. The severity of crimes that attract the death penalty is debatable due to the severity of the crime. The justice system is based upon punishment for crimes committed by emphasizing the punishment fitting the crime committed. Countries such as China and Singapore, and United States, issue the death penalty to punish murderers or rapist, therefore fueling the already going debate on how to befit the punishment is in such cases. All the death penalty aims to achieve is the punishment to those who break the rules. The death penalty has well documented weaknesses as well as strengths. Not least of is brutality and finality, some of these frailties lead to the calls for its abolishment. The death penalty is inhumane. Wrongly applied as well as completely unjustifiable sometimes killing innocent people irrespective of the crime. Life sentence of imprisonment without parole or pardon achieves all that the death penalty seeks to achieve without costing the society its moral standing and families losing those they love.
The death penalty is supposed to deter murder and bring the justice that the murder families of the victims should be rewarded (Hyden). Although many scientific researches can conclude that it does not deter murder and the members of the murder victims’ family have rejected/rejecting the program because it retraumatizes them with long process of trials, appeals, and of course the media (Hyden). In contrast, a sentence of life in prison is certain and instant, allowing the families to move on knowing that the justice of the crime is being served. Comparing whether or not the death penalty should be legalized, the reasons as to why it shouldn’t be, are strong enough to change one person’s mind. The death penalty still should be illegal in the United States.
Some may think that the death penalty is a good punishment though. Their reasons being that is more humane to put someone to death than to throw them into prison to rot for the rest of their life. Inmates who receive the life without parole punishment will never see the light of day ever again. They will spend their whole life knowing that someone else was able to escape their hell by being given the death penalty. To add on to that while they live their life out, they are stuck thinking about the crimes they have committed for the rest of their existence, no matter how much they regret what they have
In fact, the death penalty is considered immoral for it goes against the Constitution and ethnic code. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the use of “cruel and unusual punishment” is considered unconstitutional. However, majority of the capital punishments are filled with discrimination and injustice. The fact that the majority of prisoners who are sentenced with the death penalty are African Americans, reflect the cons of our society. Aside from racial discrimination, socio-economic discrimination also contribute to the flaws within our justice system. One of the top reasons why innocents are being executed or accused, allowing the guilty to get away with their crimes is that criminals who are exceptionally
As Cass R states… “Capital punishment may be morally required, not for retributive reasons, but rather to prevent the taking of innocent lives”. Death penalty is one of those extreme punishments that would create fear in the mind of any person. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life.
I do not think that the death penalty should be allowed. Anyway why not just have a life in prison without parole. It might just be cheaper to kill someone, but if it is not right for murders to kill why is it right for the government to kill. Think of it there could be many things worse than the death penalty, just imagine living with all that guilt. Also think if a child killed and got a death penalty 13 year olds have been tried as adults. So if a 13 year was killed because of a death penalty why they have to die young, because the guilt would build up over the years and be worse than the death penalty. So all in all a sentence to life in prison without parole could be worse than a death penalty.
“We oppose the death penalty for what it does to those guilty of heinous crimes, but for what it does to all of us; it offers the tragic illusion that we can defend life by taking life” by Joseph Fiorenza states that the death penalty is cruel and unjust. It may take lives of all those who are wrongfully convicted and may cost people millions of dollars. However, some may argue that the death of a criminal may bring closure to families of victims.
The problem with the death penalty is, there is a better alternative which is life without parole. The death penalty is unnecessary because the high cost of the death penalty, puts innocent lives at risk, capital punishment doesn’t deter crime, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, and Deterrence value of the death penalty.
The death penalty is one of the worst punishments for criminals. There are so many problems rooted in the death penalty.I believe we should get rid of the death penalty because they could be killing an innocent person that has been convicted. We should also get rid of the death penalty because killing someone is more expensive than keeping them in jail for life.People on death row are promised a quick death not a slow and painful one but there have been times when prisoners are taking longer to die and its more painful than it should be.
The death penalty is a good source of punishment because if a person commits a murder they deserves to be punished. However, the death penalty is cruel, inhuman and degrading. The death penalty disregards the eight amendment; which states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (U.S Constitution). The death penalty is unconstitutional because it violation of the eight Amendment. The death penalty serves as a double negative. Why kill someone for committing a murder? The death penalty does not solve the crime, fix the problems that were caused by the crime, or teach anyone a lesson. Not only does the death penalty violate the eight amendment it also violates basic human rights.
Capital Punishment is not a fair choice to do and it violates the human right to life. Everyone is born with the human right to life, even those who commit any type of crime; sentencing a person to death and executing them violates that right ( ). Just because a murderer killed someone, it does not mean their life should be taken away for punishment. It is generally accepted that people should not be punished for their actions unless they are guilty ( ). Whether the person is guilty is guilty or not they should not be given a deadly punishment. He inmates should just be locked up in prison and die from natural causes. When the prisoner becomes executed it is painful and cruel.
First of all, the death penalty puts innocent lives at risk. When people go up for the death penalty a lot of factors can determine if a person will receive death row or not. Race plays a major role in these kind of decisions. Most jurors will sentence a person that is a minority to death row with little to no evidence, before they will sentence someone who is not a minority. Which have happened in some cases, even if they have committed the same crime. One hundred and thirty-eight men and women have been acquitted from death row, and some of these individuals were days or even hours away from getting executed (30 Facts about Death Row, 2016.) Another thing that can play a role is a bad defense attorney (United States Death Penalty Facts, 2016,) A lot of death row cases have been overturned, because the defense did not do a lot of research about the incident when they were going through their trial. At least when the jury sentence someone to life
Since 1976, 138 people have been put on death row (oadp.org). This happens more often than death penalty supporters would like to believe. One reason that innocent people may be put to death is because they may get poor representation at trial. The possibility of killing another innocent, wrongfully accused person is too much to risk. To kill an innocent person is morally irresponsible and highly reprehensible. Along with innocent lives, the method of choosing the people who receive capital punishment is wrong. It is supposed to be a random choosing, but that is in fact not true. African Americans are four percent more likely to get killed on death row than a white person. Three percent of death row trials are based on sex and heritage. Not only does this make our system discriminatory, it makes them very wrong.
The whole reasoning behind the death penalty is very ignorant and idiotic. John Deer, Jesuit Priest from the Society of Jesus, said, “Behind it lies an illogical maxim: we kill those who kill to show that killing is wrong.” If the government actually believed that killing was wrong, the death penalty would have never been contrived. The only things it does is create vengeance, does not serve the cause of justice, and allows pointless infliction of immoderate punishment while less dreadful punishment can sufficiently reach the same purposes. Not only is it a bad solution but a mindless one as
Last but not least, from a sociologic perspective, capital punishment does not work as intended, to deter crime rate, rather, it might brutalize individuals, at the same time does nothing good to the victim’s family other than brutal vengeance. The origin of death penalty is served as a vehicle to put a warning for those potential future criminals that such kind of behavior will lead to death. However, so far, no clear evidence can be seen that capital punishment, as a mechanism of deterrent, actually cut down the local crime rate. Ironically, a reversal trend was found by Death Penalty Information Center (2010) in the USA that the death penalty leads to an increase in local murder rate. To die might be too easy for the mindless murderers. Also, for the relatives or friends of criminals put into death through capital punishment, they are more likely to be