preview

Common Misconceptions In Yann Martel's Life Of Pi

Decent Essays

“Life of Pi,” by Yann Martel, is a story told from the perspective of Pi Patel. Pi spent his childhood living at a zoo with his family. He also follows three separate religions and, therefore, has very strong opinions on the subject of spirituality. Within the novel, Pi counters the common misconception that freedom always has a positive effect or that it always results in happiness. To begin, Pi explains how zoo animals, contrary to popular belief, would not necessarily be happier if they were freed than if they remained in captivity. The common misconception is that the “animals in the wild are ‘happy’ because they are ‘free’”(15). However, Pi effectively explains why this is not the case. Even though a zoo limits an animal’s freedom, the animal is happier because it is protected from dangers that, in the wild, would be commonplace and supplied with necessities that would otherwise be much harder to come across. Pi uses the same logic that he uses to explain the situation of the zoo animals to clarify some common misconceptions about religion and the rituals involved with it. According to Pi, “illusions about freedom plague them both”(19). Many people see the structured rituals of religious practices to be restricting. …show more content…

A homeless person is free in the same sense that an animal that is free in the wild. Although this person is free and has almost nothing tying him or her down, he or she is most certainly not happy with the situation. Like a wild animal, he or she leads a life “of compulsion and necessity within an unforgiving social hierarchy”(16). On the other hand, a wealthy individual is likely to have his personal freedom limited severely by countless business contracts and other financial oddities. However, despite the fact that the wealthy person technically has less freedom than the homeless one, it is clear which one would be happier with the

Get Access