BURGER KING
VIEWPOINT
This case was analyzed from the point of view of Burger King’s Marketing Manager.
TIME CONTEXT
The case happened in September of the 2010.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
• How to minimize the negative feedback/perception of the company’s buy-in from a private company?
• What measures could Burger King do to dethrone McDonald’s as well as hold off the challenge of a number of other chains that were growing in size and competitive power?
STATEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES
• To boost the image/brand image of the company. • To assess the company’s overall performance, • To provide measure(s) to improve the company’s performance in the market.
AREAS OF CONSIDERATION
Strengths
1. Strong market position.
…show more content…
• The phenomenal increase is facilitated by an annual 10% growth in the amount that Americans spent on meals away from home.
• The fast-food industry is composed of numerous national and regional chains.
Sales
• Burger King’s sales have been falling steadily over recent quarters and were down 2.3% in the year to the end of June, while profits were flat compared to the same period a year earlier.
Marketing
|Advertising Campaign |Marketing strategy |Result & Flaws(if any) |
|Have it your way |Focused on sending message that burgers are | |
| |made according to customer requests not | |
| |standardized | |
|Battle of Burgers & Broiling Vs Frying |Focused on its USP (flame broiled burgers) & |Market share increased from 4% to 8.7% |
| |advantages over McDonalds | |
|Search for Herb |Disguised strategy |Campaign failed as the customers
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must
The “Burger Market” is still growing and being strong. People still want to purchase burgers.
Burger King and Wendy’s are among the top fast food chains in America, but this fact doesn’t elude either chain from having their negative and positive features. Burger King is cheaper, and has a wider assortment of food than Wendy’s, which makes Burger King more desirable to many Americans. What Wendy’s lacks in diversity, and lower priced food when compared to Burger King becomes irrelevant due to the higher speed and superior quality food they offer. Both qualities of Wendy’s help to maintain equal competition between the two in the fast food market of America.
Unlimited, endless, fast food choices, and yet there are two that stand out above the rest. McDonald’s and Burger King are the two biggest burger fast food chains in the world. So let me ask you this, who has a better menu? Who’s Cheaper? And which one is healthier? This debate will once and for all come to an end, once all of these points have been met throughout my paper. McDonald’s vs. Burger King has been a long running argument. You will finally come to realize that McDonald’s is the better choice for you.
About everyone at some age, at some point or another, and in some country has gotten a sample of American's symbol for fast food through the golden arches of McDonald's. This report will attempt to analyze the external and internal sectors that affect the company's success. The external analysis will provide opportunities and threats while the internal analysis will show indicators of strength and weakness. It will then follow up with critical issues, strategic alternatives, recommendations and implementation. The case studied is found in Appendix 2 of Mary Coulter's "Strategic Management in Action" book.
The food industry in the UK is a multi-billion pound industry that is mainly dominated by a few competitors such as McDonalds, Burger King, KFC and Subway. Most of the food sold in these fast food restaurants is unhealthy, which is becoming a huge concern as there are many people dying of obesity and other health related problems. This is one of the key social factors facing the fast food market at the moment.
Finances were examined in affective processing, in the context of figuring out who should the people invest in to get there profitable outcome. Both MCD and QSR are going to have their differences in what they each bring to the table, however, reviewing the cash flow, income statement and financial activities, this narrative research paper is going to explain what is going to have the greater advantage in the end. The bigger bang for your buck if you will. Processing all the information will give us the insight to figure out this great comparison.
Thesis Statement: Although McDonald’s and Burger King are similar; they have evident differences in their advertising models, food and their commitment with the community.
McDonalds (McD’s) and Burger King (BK) are key players in the fast food industry and have been competing for many years. They both provide similar food that is prepared quickly for a low price. So what sets them apart? The difference between McD’s and BK is their corporate culture – operational management. The manufacturing method at McD’s follows the “Doing It All For You” versus “Having It Your Way” at BK.
Subway Sandwich, as presented in the Case Study presented in the Marketing Management MGT 551 class, is an undisputed market leader in a segment that is “firmly established as a nationwide food item for which there is plenty of room in all areas” (University of Phoenix, 2008). However, with a growing competition, changing consumer trends and increased product specialization, Subway’s real strategic marketing challenge is to be able to develop and maintain a differential advantage while sustaining sales growths and profitability.
While McDonald’s and Burger King have fought over a percentage of the same market share, each company has a unique strategy with which they’ve approached the market. McDonald’s aims to deliver an inexpensive, standard, quality meal with high level of uniformity both in burger structure and in delivery times. Burger King also strives for an inexpensive, quality meal, but focuses on allowing the customer a degree of flexibility in the menu – a goal reflected in their long-time slogan, “Have it your way.” This difference results in distinct objectives for each restaurant that resonate
Fast food company’s pride themselves on making orders and food in a timely fashion as well as providing high quality food and an atmosphere for all, but what happens when a huge crisis happens and it ends in lawsuits. In this article, I will discuss Taco Bell’s 2006 E. coli crisis and how it came to be a crisis for the company. Next I will discuss some of the actions Taco Bell took to manage the crisis once it escalated and how the company approached to handle the crisis. In other words, did they do it great or poorly. Lastly, I will discuss how certain theories relate to this E. coli disaster that affected dozens of people and hurt business.
In 1954 Ray Kroc became the first franchisee appointed by Mac and Dick McDonald in San
The three restaurants are succeeding in their value propositioning. What set Burger King apart from their competition is that they
1. Competitors – As there are many other restaurants who are trying very hard to compete with McDonalds like KFC, Burger King, and Burger Fuel etc. They are also serving people with same kind of services like McDonalds and burger king is really giving a tough competition to McDonalds at the moment.