Briefing Paper

Performance management system makes a clear link between the performance and compensation, and allows the employees to understand the areas which need to be improved and directs them to appropriate training opportunities to enable improvement in performance to take place. Joseph Martocchio says, “Work with line managers to design the performance appraisal plan which best fits the specific duties and responsibilities of particular roles” (Martocchio, 2011). Compensation and reward decisions are likely to be arbitrary in the absence of a good performance management system. In short, performance management is a key component of talent management in organizations. It allows assessing the current talent and making predictions

Performance appraisal is a method which is increasingly used to evaluate employees to determine the degree to which they are performing effectively and encourage them to direct their energies towards organizational performance. Although the appraisal is being practiced, there are criticisms made against the system which generally arise from within the Orthodox and radical management frame work.

The Federal Protective Service (FPS) created RAMP in response to terrorist events. The goal of RAMP was to provide FPS with the capability to assess risks at federal facilities based on threat, vulnerability, and consequence, and track countermeasures to mitigate those risks; and improve the agency’s ability to monitor and verify that its contract security guards are trained and certified to be deployed to federal facilities (Goldstein, 2011). RAMP’s current status is chaotic. It is behind schedule and over budget. RAMP is over budget because the original system requirements changed and additional resources had to be added to accommodate the new requirements. RAMP is behind schedule due to development and implementation

Performance management relates to an organization’s ability to implement a system to evaluate and advance employee performance. Achieving peak performance requires consistency, clear objectives, and constructive employee evaluation. According to Mithas, Ramasubbu, & Sambamurthy (2011), an organization must design the performance management system based on extensive research about the organization’s mission, and then properly communicate the purpose of the system to employees, stakeholders, and decision makers. After the performing the research, the information should be used to establish the appropriate performance management specialized for the organization. In addition, an effective performance management system should align

Strategy is defined as: a way of doing something, or a game plan or plan of action. As a HR manager you must possess the ability to look at things from a strategic approach (Anthony, Kacmar, & Perrewe', 2010). Over the years the whole approach to HR has changed drastically and continues to change. This approach requires an employer to see human beings as a resource to the organization. The development of people is now the most important asset of improving the performance of an organization; this is accomplished through improving designs and methods of Human Resource Management.

The needs of employees and managers may sometimes be conflicting. For example, managers require high levels of production and longer working hours whereas employees want more time off and more focus on work/life balance. A good HR department need to work with both groups to find the right balance. A way of resolving these conflicts is to focus on the overall needs of the organisation. Ensuring that the appropriate workers are recruited and retained will help this. The skills and abilities of the employee need to be aligned to their job role and HR need to tailor development and training to ensure productivity is reached and to manage turnover of employees. Coaching and counselling

I used the internet to research and read up on performance management generally. A good source of information was ‘The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’ and ‘Forbes’.

As stated by Peter F. Drucker, “Management is about human beings. Its task is to make people capable of joint performance, to make their strengths effective and their weaknesses irrelevant.” Performance management is essential to achieving an organization 's mission statement and business goals, and also in attracting, retaining, and motivating qualified employees. There are many benefits and reasons why an organization should execute a performance management system. Performance appraisals establish the basis for qualifying, recognizing, and rewarding employee contributions. In this paper, I will discuss what performance management is, the problems with the current performance management system at my organization, how other organizations have succeeded in their performance management system and how I would advise management at my current organization to improve our performance management system.

This literature review aims to examine and evaluate the existing literature, which relates to the role of performance management in both controlling and developing employees. In the beginning, the review will emphasize on defining ‘performance management’, its brief history, evolution, and definitions through the existing literature available. In between this literature review, will highlight the issues related to performance management, which act as a hindrance in its perfect execution in organisations. The latter part of this literature review will focus on the examination of existing research if any, which has aimed to identify a link or no link between performance management and controlling and developing employees.

Performance Management Within the Workplace The basis of the mainstream of performance appraisals within the modern workplace is one person (a manager or executive) rating one more, an intrinsically individual process. There are distinction such as 360 degree appraisals that include the judgment of others such as clientele and peers/colleagues in the process but it is the action of one person transitory judgment upon another that is subjective in nature and the root cause of many of the problems encountered in the research associated with performance appraisals. Performance appraisals are of importance to the organisation, as they often provide the only measure of an individual's contribution and

The definition of the term ‘performance management’ varies in different literatures. As Hutchinson(2013) summed up, combined with Den Harton’s theory(2004), it is a continuous process which links individual and team objectives with organizational goals by measure and improve employee’s skill and performance. According to Armstrong (2012), human resource management aims at making sure the organization has the most talented, skilled and engaged people in order to attain its goals. In this context, performance management is one staple practice helping managers identifying and retaining most competent employees as well as correcting poor performance.

The main reason for this report is to exhibit an understanding of Performance management. These days, organisations take diverse ways to deal with competitive advantage. Thus, there are a mixed bag of definitions for Performance Management. Performance management is a vital issue. It is based upon the human side of administration, and focuses on representatives as essential resources inside their organizations. As indicated by Price "Performance management is aimed at recruiting capable, flexible and committed people, managing and rewarding their performance and developing key competencies" (2007: 31).

Armstrong M. and Baron A. (2005) _Managing Performance: Performance management in action_. London: CIPD in Foot, M. and Hook, C. (2008) Introducing Human Resource Management, 5th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, England, pp. 239.

I have experience in performance management and understand the performance appraisal or a disciplinary process. It aims to improve organisational, functional, team and individual performances. Effective performance management measures the progress being made towards the achievement of the organisation's business objectives. It does so by planning, establishing, monitoring, reviewing and evaluating organisational, functional, team and individual performance.

The managers get to know the reactions of their subordinates on their policies. Thus, the feedback obtained is quick compared to formal channel of communication.