INTRODUCTION
- The Swan Davis Corporation case focuses on following issues:
The importance in bond and stock valuation;
The capital structure of the company; and
How they effects to the capital budgeting decisions of the company.
- Swan- Davis Inc., (SDI) manufactures equipment for sale to large contractors, the company was found in 1976 and it went to the public in 1980 at its shares value risen from $1 to $15 since it enter to the market.
- The financial statements for the past three years show a decline trend in both the operation and return on shareholder of the company, so a closer look at the factors contributing to this decline is needed.
- The capital structure of company mainly constitutes of:
1. Deb
a. Bond A
…show more content…
- Moreover, capital budgeting correlates to security valuation as well when the inflation occurs. For that circumstance, the firm should identify the projects that implement to the firm's value by preparing the portfolio diversifying their products in purpose of appealing to investors. This kind of task requires the firm, especially the marketing research group, to specify the size of market and potential customers to reach their needs.
Question 4: As the case concerned, the B bond is not actively traded and no valid market quotation is available. The reasonable interest rate to use in valuing the B bonds is calculated as follow: Using the following give data:
Initiative data Calculation result is compounded semiannually
Par value (FV) = $1,000
Coupon rate = 6.90%
Payment annually = $69
Year to maturity = 25
Year to call = 23
Payment semiannually = $34.5
N = 46
Formula:
Present value of Bond B's cash flow is $813.88 From the perspective of the most recent S&P Bond Guide, due to the financial problem in 1994, three-level downgrading was applied to the B Bond yield rate that results in the rating position change in industry average yield into BB by 8.8%. Therefore, the different BB yield and the industry average rate indicated that the investor required a higher return on B bond since it is more risky than that in the previous year. There is a restriction in decision making of buying the B bonds in this
The 1994 Basic Industries annual report shows a decline in the return on owners’ equity. This has got the portfolio people worried. An analysis has to be made of the way the company has achieved its return on equity over the last 10 years. The focus should especially be on the 1993-1994 period and the quality of the returns on equity of 1985 and 1994 should be compared, as well as other key financial ratios. By doing these financial analysis we hope to find out why the return on shareholders’ equity is varying in time.
Shareholders want results and returns immediately while management knows it would take strategic planning to take the investment forward, it can lead to an agency cost. The project is a risky venture because it can bring many disagreements between managers and stockholders putting aside the company’s long-term objectives and goals to increase the value. Financial decisions in marketing are to increase sales and demand, therefore it helps to improve return on equity. As said before a market research is necessary for each designated location and to learn about the mass market they are about to enter. Finance helps to fund and implement marketing strategy which is crucial in the future to generate loyal customers, the most profitable customers for a company. The product mix is going to grow in its all four dimensions and would take financial decisions from the marketing managers to see what products are convenient for the customers. Financial decisions in operations deal mainly with the supply chain. To keep customers satisfied is necessary to invest heavily in logistics, technology, and inventory. Finance keeps track of every monetary move made by the company, like paying bills and collecting money generated. In other words, it assists to cut unnecessary operating costs and seek ways to improve the business operations by measuring performance.
Note to Instructors: When assigning this case, inform the students that the firm’s stock price has recently dropped from $7 per share to $5.50 per share. Case objective: The objective of this case is to cover financial statement analysis and cash flow analysis, with a particular emphasis on liquidity and net working capital. Student Preparation time: Approximately 2 hours. Answers to questions: 1. Why has the stock price fallen despite the fact that the net income has increased? Although Signal has made a net profit that is higher than that of the previous year, its net profit margin is lower (6.98% vs 7.43%). Most of this decrease has been caused by the significant
From the case exhibit 2, the company had a stellar performance from 1983 to 1987. As an industry leader in construction industry, their net annual sales increased significantly from 1.6B in 1983 to 2.9B in 1987 about 81% growth in 4 years. Their operating income before tax (EBIT) had a steady growth from 1983 except a dip in 1987 mainly due to changes in the overall industry primarily contributed by increased in cost. At the same time, the return on equity at end of
The company has attempted to recover from the losses during the last decade through joint ventures and outsourcing. As such, the aim of this paper is to analyze the most recent annual reports of the company and show how various financial ratios
Results from the data analysis show that when compared with the previous year, high performance was achieved. In some other areas, when compared with its competitors the company performed poor in terms of inventory management, credit pay-out period, revenue per fixed asset.
In 2011, the Group delivered a strong financial performance, continuing the trend of increasing profitability from 2010. Its performance is slightly weaker in 2012, due to challenging macroeconomic conditions in many regions. Despite an increase in revenues, the more than proportional increase in costs took its toll on the company’s gross profits.
· Three years financial statements (1994, 1993 and 1985) and reported 10 year financial highlights (1985 to 1994) were available for the analysis assignment
3. Shareholders expectation: After 10 years of poor performance, shareholder must be putting pressure on management for profitability.
Our company was not performed excellently during this stage. The overall market share for our products was in the state of continued to decline (from 25.51% to23.11%) as well as the share price (from $40.36 to $27.54). consequently, this sluggish performance led to the market capitalization decreased from $81 million to $66 million, which is in the third place in the four companies.
This report will look at the investments of the firm, including analysis into the balance sheet and profit and loss. While also looking at the sources and uses of funds. Included also will be a share price evaluation and how the results of the earlier analysis could explain the fluctuations of the share price.
negative movements in the firm’s financials indicate that it is facing challenges that need to be
Financial statement analysis is a technique of answering various questions regarding the performance of the firm in the past, present and future. So in this assignment we have
Furthermore, I have also illustrated the trends of the last four years via graphs and a brief explanation of the figures are also given below the each graph. Moreover, I have also done the cash flow analysis that shows the current liquidity condition of the company and it also indicates the main cash sources. Besides this, I have also focused on information which is not related to finance that shows the code of conduct, economic responsibilities as well as social responsibility of the company.
The higher loss in the preceding year was mainly attributed to the impairment of assets held for sale of RM 167.0 million and a forced write-down of RM 103.1 million on property, plant and equipment. Accordingly, the loss per share has decreased to 18.1 sen per share from 104.9 sen per share in the preceding year. The Group’s shareholders funds now stand at negative RM 309.4 million. On operations, one of our overseas customers did not extend their wet lease contract with us when the contract expired in September 2011. Regrettably, we have also ceased to indirectly serve our major shareholder, Pos Malaysia, when all our contracts were terminated in December 2011. The Group will continue to develop new businesses while being mindful of the financial condition of the Group, especially the depleting cash flow.