BIOS275 Pharmacology and Medical Treatment Application Paper Assignments and Grading Rubric Relating course content to the current health care environment is an integral part of your learning. Two (2) application papers are required in this course. These short papers will give you the opportunity to apply course content. They should be approximately 500 words in length each (2 pages). The topics for these two papers are noted below. Refer to at least one outside source in addition to your text as you prepare each of these papers. Application Paper One: New Pharmaceuticals Application Paper Two: Pain Medications The body of the papers should be approximately 500 words (2 pages); there should also be a title page and a reference page. …show more content…
Finally, you will describe your opinion of using such type of pain medication. The two topic papers are worth 140 points (70 points each) and represent 14% of your total grade. Each paper will be graded on the following: Content 50 points Grammar/spelling 10 points References/citations 10 points Based on the following criteria: Content (double points for this category) 1. The paper fulfills the purpose of the assignment as described in the syllabus and in this document (up to 10 points) 2. The introduction leads logically to the main idea or thesis (up to 10 points) 3. Supporting evidence is developed and analyzed sufficiently (up to 10 points) 4. Conclusion provides insightful closure (up to 10 points) 5. The content flows logically and demonstrates an understanding of the topic (up to 10 points) Grammar/Spelling 1. Sentences are grammatically correct (noun/verb agreement, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.) (up to 5 points) 2. Spelling is correct (e.g., homonyms used correctly, no misspellings) (up to 5 points) References/citations 1. Sources are cited in the body of the paper using APA format (up to 5 points) 2. Reference list is included with the paper that lists only sources cited in the document (up to 5 points) Points will be awarded for each criterion on the following scale: 5 points = few or no weaknesses found; writer satisfies the criteria with distinction 4 points = strengths outweigh the weaknesses; writer shows sound
In writing a research paper, the hunt for creditable sources to use can be difficult. However, if one knows how to evaluate a source and deem it acceptable for college-level work, then it will make it easier to find sources to use. Many professors will reject sources if they are not academically acceptable, like advertisement websites and celebrity magazines, so it is important to look for sources produced by professional. Also, check the professional’s credentials, degrees, and knowledge. To determine if a source is creditable one must evaluate a source using a certain set of guidelines, in doing so a student can become good at sorting out the acceptable from the unacceptable. In evaluating a source, one needs to have three things for a general evaluation, which is author qualifications, accessibility to the source, and the information that is going to help one from it.
Note: Cite references in MLA format, in-text, and parenthetically. Complete a Works Cited page of all references used.
C. Preview of Main Points: (How many main points will you have and what exactly are they?) Today I am going to inform you about….
This milestone, which covers Section II of Final Project Part I, should be a paper structured as follows:
Evidence is worked into the literature review effectively. The evidence and reasons are organized chronologically, and this organization is extremely important since the proposition focuses on the chronological progression of the argumentation style. One element I think is missing is a conclusion paragraph. The literature review seems to end abruptly on evidence. Score: 3
First you need to add a source to your document. A works cited list is a list of sources located at the end of a document. A bibliography is a list of sources that you consulted when you created the document. After you add sources, you can automatically generate a works cited list or a bibliography based on that source information. Citations are references that are placed inline with the text.
For this paper you must have: Sources 1, 2 and 3 which are provided as a loose insert inside this question paper.
8-11 marks – Some evaluative points covering a range of issues. The argument is well organised, but may lack balance or development, and is related to the context of the question. Good use of examples. Valid conclusions that effectively summarise issues and arguments is competent and understanding is good.
Bibliography – a list of references that you have used and cited within your text, plus any additional information or sources that further describe the resources you used to help you in preparing your work. A bibliography is compiled and presented in the same way as a reference list and located at the end of your document.
Describe one or more of the cited literature references used as background information (i.e. information for which an external source was credited in the references).
Please describe two (and only two) reasons why post-licensure requirements for recordkeeping and reporting are particularly important for product designated as biologics
The total mark for this paper is 60. The marks for each question are shown in brackets – use this as a guide as to how much time to spend on each question.
This paper must be e-mailed to me as an MS-Word document before June 14, 2015. You may use any reference materials that you wish and consult with other people for help, but the document must be written by you. Write the answers in your own words. Do not cut and paste sentences from Internet sources.
Introduction: 25 – Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the assignment. It has an engaging introductory sentence, context, raises excellent questions and has a strong thesis.