preview

Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis

Decent Essays

One of the most important documents written in American history, the Articles of Confederation, was crucial to the foundation of American principles. However, there were many inherent flaws in its making, which were addressed by a few different leaders. The Articles of Confederation paved the way towards a successful country, but some of the problems would have sent the country backwards. One of these problems was that for an amendment to be made to the Articles, every state would have to agree, and Rhode Island never sent delegates to conventions to discuss these amendments. This meant that there could never be flexibility in the amendments even when necessary. This dilemma forced many elites of America to come together and completely rewrite …show more content…

Madison argues that all of the main conflict that occurs between men revolves around property and its unequal distribution. He states that those who hold and those who do not hold property would always have different interests. For example, a landowner, merchant, or manufacturer who owns property would do everything in their power to hold that property, while a person without property seeks to own some. This conflict of interests can manifest itself into different types of conflict, so Madison thinks that this conflict should be the first priority to be …show more content…

10 was one of the main factors that allowed for the ratification of the modern constitution and government system. Idealistically, Madison’s ideas about government are possibly the best possible solution to the conflict of factions, yet in reality, Federalist No. 10 has been manipulated in ways that separate people more than unite them. While Madison is probably right in that republicanism is better than simply a popular democracy, his writing essentially did nothing but flip the party in power. Before, the power was held by the majority common people, which was bad because only their interests were being addressed, but after Madison wrote Federalist No. 10, the elite group was the group from which delegates were being elected. Madison was one of the property owners, and he feared that the common sort would prevent him from remaining in power so he had to switch the way the system worked. Through his rhetorical analysis he convinced the people that electing delegates was the way to go, and in the end only the members of the elite group were elected. He wanted a government that protected the rights of the rich property owners from the common sort and he was successful in doing so. He says “a rage for paper money” will hinder the abilities of those elected and therefore should not be. This prevented anyone who was poor from being elected. Now, Madison also makes the assumption that the people elected will somehow throw

Get Access