Analyzing a Published Work

The purpose of this assignment is to give you an opportunity to apply some of the critical reading strategies you have evaluated.

The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.

To properly analyze an argumentative article properly, you have to read very carefully about the facts that you are reading. It allows a reader to think enormously amount the facts and also allows the person the ability to think about the claim and consider the different factor of the argument. On a daily bases people come across arguments that they think is interesting either person to person, televisions shows or on some type of text like books or newspapers. One article that one can truly analyze is John Orozco article, “My long road to the Olympics: Why today's athletes deserve your support”. When looking at this article one is presented with a gymnast’s road to the Olympics and how Olympic Athlete need their home country support and funds.

Everyone has opinions about something these days, whether it is the United State’s involvement in the middle east or a general manager’s offseason acquisitions. Probably the most common ways of presenting one’s opinion is writing an editorial for a newspaper. In writing these positions, the author has to think of a clear and clever way to persuade his audience to agree with him. All editorials, at their core, follow the same formula. One example of an editorial to break down is a recent one written by the New York Post’s Editorial Board on the NFL’s rules.

The subject is that Donald Trump doesn't deserve to be the president of the united states. They claim he is not worthy enough of being "Racist" for accusing all mexicans of being rapists and criminals. Which could be false accusation because americans can be rapists and criminals also. They also claim Donald Trump is an elitist and he thinks he is better than everyone else. The authors position in this editorial is a part of The Editorial Boardset. The author of this editorial does support the evidence with facts. I think this author does try to tell his emotions to the readers. The author strongly explains everything Donald Trump does wrong and I think the only thing this author looks for are the negative things in Donald, so he doesn't

Consideration of opposing arguments, interchange of thoughts, and debating out the resolution are all ancient but important journalistic traditions. Additional editorial cooperation can be especially helpful by having different eyes on the writings themselves and ensuring that the writings’ flair and tone do not compromise journalism’s obligation to objective provision.

Though I do believe that I can gather the proper details in preparation of an assignment, my hope is to both expand my knowledge and experience in research and compilation of information into smooth, concise segments. The ability in being able to bring about a point to the reader or listener can help in the many other classes and their assignments involving the process of purposeful analysis in a topic to the application of conveying the thoughts to text. Along with the conventional skill of preparing text, the knowledge of properly identifying sections of possible misinterpretation would allow for the betterment in allowing the intended meaning of my words to show through. As the course description would suggest, an emphasize on the critical analysis of topics is a key point in the class. Expanding that part of my capabilities would be beneficial to both the depth in which I discern meaning from works of others and how in a few words I might be able to procure a thought-provoking message that has a meaning to each their

Body a. Analysis of author’s background and intended audience Author Kate Dailey has a background with writing for several magazines including Vox, BBC, and Men’s Health. She writes for a magazine that is striving to write for a "single worldwide edition targeted for a highly mobile, opinion-leading audience who want to learn about world events in a sophisticated context" (Sweney). b. Analysis of article’s structure and clarity c. Analysis of article’s tone and language The author writes in a lighthearted manner that makes her article easy to read. However, she is slightly biased in tone pretty much only using sources that support her argument but manages to avoid coming off as if she is preaching to the reader.

I would like to convey to my audience that I am well-informed on both sides of the issue and this source will give me the credibility to do that. It will also allow me to argue the opposing viewpoint in a strategic manner.

A Discussions (2-5 pages) indicates and interprets your findings, proposes your policy suggestions, clarifies the limitations (including the validity and ethical issues) of the study, and suggests for future research.

Finally, a personal analysis of the issue under discussion will be established and a conclusion as well. Briefly, the essay will argue that affirmative

The aim of literary analysis is to extract information about a work of literature from the text itself. Literary analysis essentially involves a detailed examination of the text to answer predefined types of questions, including what the author intended to say or why and to

Analytical Summaries - For this assignment, you will compose two short critical essays explaining and evaluating arguments by other authors. This assignment allows you to analyze an issue from a variety of perspectives and assess arguments for or against the issue. By focusing your attention on how the original authors use evidence and reasoning to construct and support their positions, you can recognize the value of critical thinking in public discourse.

State what you agreed, disagreed with in this week's article. Provide two to three specific examples.

From my perspective, the news item and the original article are overall both scientific, persuasive and precisely reasoned.