Alone Together: the Robotic Movment Essay

In my opinion, we should embrace and welcome robots into our daily lives because they improve our society in various ways. Some of the ways our society has benefited from the creation of robots include transportation, home maintenance, home assistance, education, security, entertainment, disabled assisted living, and even elderly assisted living. In the article The Future of Robot Caregivers, the author, Louise Aronson, states that the idea of robot caregivers shouldn’t be as threatening as most people perceive. She also states that our society as whole, not just the elderly, will benefit greatly in many aspects. For example, Aronson begins by mentioning that caregiving is a difficult job and that “it is work that many people either can’t or

We rely on technology for everything in our lives today. It is hard for us to be more than ten steps away from our phone. Dependence on technology is even evident in Fahrenheit 451. In the novel, the TV is everything to some people. It becomes their friend their family and even their life. They even have technology that butters their toast and medical procedures. We use technology everyday whether it is our phone, laptop, or ipod. We use them every single day all day long. If something was not to work for a single day our society would crash with the absence of technology.

In his 2011 The Chronicle Review article “Programmed for Love” Jeffrey R. Young interviews Professor Sherry Turkle about her experience with what she calls “sociable robots”. Turkle has spent 15 years studying robotics and its social emergence into society. After extensive research and experimenting with the robots, she believes that soon they will be programmed to perform specific tasks that a human would normally do. While this may seem like a positive step forward to some people, Turkle fears the worst. The article states that she finds this concept “demeaning, ‘transgressive,’ and damaging to our collective sense of humanity.” (Young, par. 5). She accredits this to her personal and professional experience with the robots. Turkle and her

At work, people are claiming to be too busy on their devices to be able to have conversations. In fact, they do not want to have the face to face interaction, but would “rather just do things on [their] blackberry” (136). Moreover, a “sixteen-year-old boy who relies on texting for almost everything says wistfully, ‘Someday, someday, but certainly not now, I’d like to learn how to have a conversation’” (136). The reliance on technology has increased significantly and the necessity for conversation has pivoted. A teenage boy confesses that he feels more comfortable talking to an “artificial intelligence program” (138) about dating instead of his own father. Similarly, many people want “Siri, the digital assistant on Apple’s iPhone, [to become] more advanced, [because] ‘she’ will be more and more like a best friend” (138). Robots are being given more credit for comforting humans than humans themselves. Not only are the younger generations thinking this, but also the elders. When Turkle brought a baby seal robot to a nursing home, an elder woman began to speak to it and feel comforted by it. It is a tragedy that humans are feeling a deeper connection with robots than other humans. Humans have the experiences and the feelings that the robots are not capable of having. Hence, there is confusion about the difference between conversation and

The author's purpose of this essay is contemplating whether or not laws should be made protecting robots. Throughout the essay he uses evidence from scientists who have dones tests, and it shows how people act.

The problem is that humans are essentially allowing robotic pets to replace their own/real pets. One can wonder how anyone would want a robotic pet that will never show any real “true emotions”. As Frank Mullin states, “Would the owner still feel pride, knowing in the back of her mind that the aloofness was coded into the cat by some computer programmer?” (“Love in the Time of Robots”). Mr. Mullin goes on to explain that the love and emotion a person sees from a robotic pet is not the same as having an actual pet care for one. For example, one feels a sense of self-importance when a real pet actually loves them for who they are, and not just because it was “created to”. Even so, humans still seem to love these robots. In the 2001 video, “Pleo: Robot, pet or both?”, the host expressed his unconscious feeling of love towards Pleo. Judging by Pleo’s easy going manner, it is not hard to see how he did. At the same time, Frank Mullin pleads, “It might be worthwhile to ask whether giving love to something that cannot love you back is truly a friendship at all.” Although these robotic pets might seem to provide one with affection, their love will never amount to the true love one feels through person to person or person to animal communication in today’s

Jerry West’s article “Robots on Earth” talks about robots that, unlike books or movies, aid people simplifying their lives and health. As robots don’t need specific conditions; they are perfect for performing jobs that might be harmful to humans. Like the R2 humanoid at the International Space Station, which completes dangerous and mundane tasks for astronauts and frees their time. They also boost our health; they are working with scientists to create an exoskeleton for quadriplegic people. Robots aren’t evil, they’re useful machines that have so much to offer and make our lives safer.lives

Turkle speaks about her occupation at MIT where analysts experiment with robots by propelling its capacity to be instructors, home associates and closest companions which focuses on specific age groups but particularly to the elderly (2015). According to statistics there is no position available in this field to take care of the old due to the population of less younger people. Therefore, researchers at MIT trusts the making of ‘caring machines’. For this reason, Turkle indicates roboticists are not by any means the only individuals with this thought, there has been chatter from others that is not in the robotic world (2015). Therefore, humans trust the idea of having robots taking care of the elderly rather than people. The reasons is that humans are thought to be cruel where the overseer can steal or be abusive (Turkle 2015). Strangely enough, this shows grown ups have turned out to be so contributed with technology, believing a robot can talk and care a for a person. Additionally, it demonstrates a discrimination against mankind, due to not trusting the ability of a human being. Furthermore, this creates the lack of living life and facing reality. As a result, artificial intelligence has driven into the adults’ minds where they trust that contact with robots is great yet it is definitely

Thus, when the statement arises that robots can substitute authenticity, it is looked upon as idiotic through Turkle’s eyes. She states, authenticity for her “follows from the ability to put oneself in the place of another, to relate to the other because of a shared store of human experiences.” Accordingly, robots lack authenticity because they have not been born, had families or know loss. Therefore, when Turkle was confronted by a Scientific American reporter to talk about robots and our future she was accused of being no better than bigots who deny gays and lesbians the right to marry for objecting to the marriage of people to robots. That being the case, if one does not embrace technology, there must be something wrong with them.

Lately there have been more and more smart machines that have been taking over regular human tasks but as it grows the bigger picture is that robots will take over a lot of tasks now done by people. But, many people think that there are important ethical and moral issues that have to be dealt with this. Sooner or later there is going to be a robot that will interact in a humane manner but there are many questions to be asked like; how will they interact with us? Do we really want machines that are independent, self-directed, and has affect and emotion? I think we do, because they can provide many benefits. Obviously, as with all technologies, there are dangers as well. We need to ensure that people always

After watching the movie I, Robot, I find that many ethical issues come about from the technology shown in the movie. The movie takes place in 2035 and is about robots that are programmed with Three Laws: First Law-A robot must never harm a human being or, through inaction, allow any harm to come to a human; Second Law-A robot must obey the orders given to them by human beings, except where such orders violate the First Law; Third Law- A robot must protect its own existence unless this violates the First or Second Laws. Humans use these robots to do common tasks for them. Some of the ethical questions arisen from this movie include do robots have the ability to make emotional or ethical decision, are they entitled to the same rights as

Isaac Asimov presents a positive view of technology, namely robots, in I, Robot; however, it seems to be a reluctant view. Susan Calvin tells the narrator a series of stories that may seem like Asimov has a negative attitude towards robots because there is always some conflict with the robot. Furthermore, the magnitude of the troubles that arise grows throughout the book. When analyzed, however, these same stories show a positive view of robotic technology through the human and robot connections, the cause of conflict, and the robots’ ultimate and superior ability to do what needs to be done.

Robots have always been a fascination though many Americans openly discuss their concerns with what negative outcomes that automatons are capable of creating though a lot of people fail to see the greater positive outcomes of assimilating these machines into our society even though we are moving into that direction. This essay will discuss some of the pros and cons of 3 main perspectives, which would be Commerce/Social, Medical, and Military with the hope to persuade others into accepting robots.

Throughout “Love and Sex with Robots,” author David Levy explores the topic of human intimacy, and how it has developed throughout history. While his book begins with discussing human-to-human relationships and intimacy, he explores modern technological intervention like dating websites and electronic sex toys. However, like the title suggests, Levy uses the the majority of his book to convince the reader that the use of sex robots are an inevitable evolution of robotic intimacy, and will be especially useful for minority sectors of the population like misfits and the sexually inadequate (291).

Robots are a more important part of society now then they have ever been. Issac Asimov lived in a time where robots were merely an idea, but that didn’t stop him from using this idea of a robot to represent different aspects of humanity throughout the chapters of his book I, Robot. Asimov’s book reflects on human nature and what it means to be human. Reflecting can help people to better understand themselves and the people that surround them.