preview

A Major Source Of Discussion Concerning Shakespeare 's Hamlet

Decent Essays

A major source of discussion regarding Shakespeare’s Hamlet involves whether or not the title character is indeed mad or if he is only acting. One stance claims that Hamlet is mad throughout the play. Others may think that his madness is only latent, up until a certain point. There are many opinions on exactly where this shifting point occurs, thus opening up many possible explanations. Another argument explains that Hamlet performs his madness throughout the play, as evidenced by his unremitting sharp wit, the opinions of other characters, and Hamlet’s own admissions. A reoccurring and significant aspect of Hamlet’s character is his wit. From his first line in the play, he is revealed to have a quick wit as well as an insinuating and …show more content…

This demonstrates that since the beginning of the play, his sharp wit has not altered. In response to Claudius’s inquiry as to where Polonius’s body is, Hamlet replies, “In heaven; send hither to see: if your messenger find him not there, seek him i ' the other place yourself” (4.3.36-39). Once again, even while likely suffering an adrenaline rush from killing Polonius, Hamlet is able to cleverly insinuate that Claudius is going to hell soon. In his banter with the grave digger near the end of the play, Hamlet maintains his quick wit. He even notes himself that he and Horatio “must speak by the card, or equivocation will undo [them]” (5.1.128-129). He sees himself as a person who is able to think on his toes to avoid the vagueness and tricky language of the grave digger. His constant and reliable wit and sharpness is one evidence that illustrates that Hamlet retains his sanity throughout the play. Concerning the way he speaks and acts, the other characters in the play have opinions on Hamlet’s supposed madness themselves. Claudius makes a distinction between the way Hamlet acted previous to his father’s death and the way he currently acts: “nor the exterior nor the inward man resembles that it was” (2.2.6-7). Claudius can distinguish a before and after point regarding Hamlet’s madness. After spying on Hamlet’s interactions with Ophelia, Claudius thinks that “what he spake, though it lack 'd form a little, was not like madness” (3.1.171-172). In this instance, Claudius

Get Access