HW2_360_2

.pdf

School

Texas A&M University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

360

Subject

Material Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by DeanOxide11567 on coursehero.com

Rishi Chakrapani UIN: 331002779 MEEN 360 HW #2 Chapter 7, due 9/5/2023 through Canvas (due at 11:59 PM). 1. (T/F) The following materials typically exhibit strength described by a Weibull distribution: TRUE ceramics TRUE glasses FALSE metals FALSE thermoplastic polymers above Tg 2. Below are fractured surfaces of three different materials. Please label the three images as (1) brittle, intergranular fracture (2) brittle transgranular fracture, or (3) ductile fracture. Transgranular Brittle Fracture Ductile Fracture Intergranular Brittle Fracture (Answers to #3, #4, and #5 are on the next few pages) 3. A composite material has a plane-strain fracture toughness of 10 MPa m . Non-destructive testing has determined that the largest internal flaw has a full length of 150 μm. a. Assuming a geometric factor of f = 1.0 , as in Figure 7-1b of the textbook (reproduced on the next page), determine the stress at which fracture will occur.
Rishi Chakrapani UIN: 331002779 b. If the yield strength of the composite is 500 MPa, upon loading, will the material fail by general yielding or fast fracture? 4. Below is a Weibull plot of a new material made with two different recipes, A & B. What are their Weibull moduli, m ? Which one is more reliable (in terms of predictability/consistency)? Why? Which one is likely to be stronger? Why?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help