Chapter 3.1 Assessment - Criminal Procedure.pdf

1/16/24, 8:05 AM WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1241_JUS2201_OL2 https://berkeleycollege.instructure.com/courses/40147/quizzes/178369 1/14 WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment Due Jan 20 at 11:59pm Points 100 Questions 25 Available Jan 14 at 12am - Jan 27 at 11:59pm Time Limit None Allowed Attempts 3 Instructions Attempt History Attempt Time Score KEPT Attempt 2 8 minutes 100 out of 100 LATEST Attempt 2 8 minutes 100 out of 100 Attempt 1 17 minutes 96 out of 100 Score for this attempt: 100 out of 100 Submitted Jan 16 at 8:04am This attempt took 8 minutes. Choose the best possible answer according to etext. There is no time limit, however once you begin, you must finish. Take the Quiz Again 4 / 4 pts Question 1

1/16/24, 8:05 AM WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1241_JUS2201_OL2 https://berkeleycollege.instructure.com/courses/40147/quizzes/178369 2/14 In Kyllo v. U.S. (2001), SCOTUS ruled that the discovery and measurement of which of the following from a home was a Fourth Amendment search? heat Correct! Correct! light noise odor 4 / 4 pts Question 2 According to the SCOTUS opinion in U.S. v. White (1971), involving a friend wired for sound for the police: a person contemplating illegal activities must realize and risk that a friend might be reporting to the police. Correct! Correct! a search warrant is required any time electronic devices are used to obtain evidence. a defendant has a constitutionally protected expectation that a person with whom he or she is conversing will not reveal the conversation to the police. a suspect’s friend may relate the substance of conversations between the two without violating the Fourth Amendment, but the amendment is violated if the friend records those conversations for the police without a warrant.

1/16/24, 8:05 AM WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1241_JUS2201_OL2 https://berkeleycollege.instructure.com/courses/40147/quizzes/178369 3/14 4 / 4 pts Question 3 Police used a thermal imager to scan Kyllo’s home, because they had information that he was growing marijuana. Officers did not have a warrant and claimed the search was in plain view. SCOTUS ruled that: the use of a thermal imager to explore details of a home that, in the past, would have been unknown without a physical intrusion is a search and is subject to Fourth Amendment requirements. Correct! Correct! the use of a thermal imager did not alter the fact that the officers observed the marijuana in plain view. thermal imagers are common devices and, therefore, the search was in plain view. the use of a thermal imager is always illegal. 4 / 4 pts Question 4 General warrants, or writs of assistance, as they were known in Britain and in the American colonies: gave officers blanket authority to completely search a particular shop or home. gave the person with the writ authority to enter any house for the entire life of the monarch. Correct! Correct!

1/16/24, 8:05 AM WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1241_JUS2201_OL2 https://berkeleycollege.instructure.com/courses/40147/quizzes/178369 4/14 found favor in the American colonies because they were more restrictive than a warrantless search. were repealed in the American colonies by the Stamp Act. 4 / 4 pts Question 5 What doctrine did SCOTUS create in U.S. v. Jacobsen (1984)? private-search reconstruction doctrine the reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine the private search doctrine Correct! Correct! the trespass doctrine 4 / 4 pts Question 6 In what case did the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decide that the searches of a laptop computer, a cell phone, and a flash drive were private searches (searches conducted by private parties not associated with the government)? U.S. v. White (1971)

1/16/24, 8:05 AM WK. 3, Chap. 3 Assessment : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1241_JUS2201_OL2 https://berkeleycollege.instructure.com/courses/40147/quizzes/178369 5/14 U.S. v. Lichtenberger (2015) Correct! Correct! Illinois v. Caballes (2005) U.S. v. Miller (1976) 4 / 4 pts Question 7 In what case did SCOTUS rule that, in some circumstances, there is no right to privacy in bank records? U.S. v. Miller (1976) Correct! Correct! Illinois v. Caballes (2005) U.S. v. Jones (2012) State v. Patino (2012) 4 / 4 pts Question 8 In Kyllo v. U.S. (2001), SCOTUS ruled that the discovery and measurement of heat from a home by law enforcement, using a method not readily available to the public, is a Fourth Amendment search.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help